From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
To: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, tony.luck@intel.com, joro@8bytes.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
rdunlap@infradead.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
bp@alien8.de, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>"Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rjw@rjwysocki.net>pavel@ucw.cz, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Subject: [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:36:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A4132B.4030801@canonical.com> (raw)
Hello Jiang,
A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
reverting the following commit resolves this bug:
commit cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079
Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 16:11:52 2014 +0800
x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI
The regression was introduced as of v3.19-rc1.
I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
or would it be best to submit a revert request?
Thanks,
Joe
[0] http://pad.lv/1440072
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 19:36 Joseph Salisbury [this message]
2015-07-14 2:42 ` Subject: [v3.19 Regression] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI Jiang Liu
2015-07-14 16:11 ` Joseph Salisbury
2015-07-14 17:22 ` Joseph Salisbury
2015-07-15 3:17 ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-15 16:05 ` Joseph Salisbury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A4132B.4030801@canonical.com \
--to=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).