From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dannenberg Subject: Re: [RFC] TI BQ242xx Battery Charger Development/Consolidation Plans Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:20:41 -0500 Message-ID: <55CB7259.3010608@ti.com> References: <1438706177-8115-1-git-send-email-dannenberg@ti.com> <55C23441.2030305@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:35018 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932165AbbHLQVJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:21:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Pallala, Ramakrishna" , Laurentiu Palcu Cc: David Woodhouse , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Sebastian Reichel , "Palcu, Laurentiu" , =?UTF-8?B?UGFsaSBSb2jDoXI=?= , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Hi Ram, On 08/11/2015 06:12 AM, Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: > I have a separate driver for bq24261 charger and it is ready for upstream. Can I push the patch? > > Thanks, > Ram > Wow I'm impressed! You are doing all the TI drivers so there is nothing left for me to do :) On a more serious note thanks for chiming in here. Could you please share/post the driver that you have? The bq24261 is basically the same as the bq24261M and bq24262 that I'm working on so I would like to check feature completeness and how I could potentially integrate pieces of my work into yours. Also while we are at it, please note the bq24261 is "not recommended for new designs" by TI. What should be used instead moving forward is the bq24261M. Thanks and Regards, -- Andreas Dannenberg Texas Instruments Inc.