From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
nm@ti.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rob.herring@linaro.org, lee.jones@linaro.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F72C97.2030306@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b87b162eabd1570ae2311e1ef8655acda72f678.1441972771.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 09/11/2015 07:01 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Regulators already have stable DT bindings, wherein the consumer (of
> supplies) will have following for each regulator/supply.
>
> <name>-supply: <phandle to the regulator node>;
>
> Current OPP bindings extend above, by transforming it into a list of
> phandles. But we missed the <name> string, which is used to identify the
> regulator.
>
> And looking from regulators perspective, having two different ways of
> specifying regulators doesn't seem like a step forward, it also means we
> have to update every single device binding. And things will become
> complex.
>
> Another way to support multiple regulators per device (in OPP V2
> bindings) is to leave regulator consumer bindings as is, and create a
> 'supply-names' property in the opp-table node, which will contain a list
> of strings. The names in this list shall match 'name' from the
> '<name>-supply' strings present in the device node.
>
> The strings in this list also specify the order in which values must be
> present in 'opp-microvolt' and 'opp-microamp' properties.
>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> index 0cb44dc21f97..8759bc4783ed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> @@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ This describes the OPPs belonging to a device. This node can have following
> - compatible: Allow OPPs to express their compatibility. It should be:
> "operating-points-v2".
>
> +- supply-names: This is a required property, only if multiple supplies are
> + available for the device. Otherwise it is optional.
> +
> + This list is used to pass names of all the device supplies. The order of names
> + present here is important, as that should match the order in which values are
> + present in 'opp-microvolt' and 'opp-microamp' properties.
> +
What if we have a 2nd device and supply rail? For example, what if the
L2$ has a separate rail from the cores but is linked to the OPPs.
> - OPP nodes: One or more OPP nodes describing voltage-current-frequency
> combinations. Their name isn't significant but their phandle can be used to
> reference an OPP.
> @@ -97,8 +104,8 @@ properties.
> Single entry is for target voltage and three entries are for <target min max>
> voltages.
>
> - Entries for multiple regulators must be present in the same order as
> - regulators are specified in device's DT node.
> + Entries for multiple regulators must be present in the same order as their
> + names are present in 'supply-names' property of the opp-table.
>
> - opp-microamp: The maximum current drawn by the device in microamperes
> considering system specific parameters (such as transients, process, aging,
> @@ -107,10 +114,12 @@ properties.
>
> Should only be set if opp-microvolt is set for the OPP.
>
> - Entries for multiple regulators must be present in the same order as
> - regulators are specified in device's DT node. If this property isn't required
> - for few regulators, then this should be marked as zero for them. If it isn't
> - required for any regulator, then this property need not be present.
> + Entries for multiple regulators must be present in the same order as their
> + names are present in 'supply-names' property of the opp-table.
> +
> + If this property isn't required for few regulators, then this should be marked
> + as zero for them. If it isn't required for any regulator, then this property
> + need not be present.
Remind me of when do we have multiple regulators for a cpu? The number
of supplies should be defined by the cpu binding as function of how many
supply rails a cpu has.
>
> - clock-latency-ns: Specifies the maximum possible transition latency (in
> nanoseconds) for switching to this OPP from any other OPP.
> @@ -369,13 +378,16 @@ Example 4: Handling multiple regulators
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> ...
>
> - cpu-supply = <&cpu_supply0>, <&cpu_supply1>, <&cpu_supply2>;
> + vcc0-supply = <&cpu_supply0>;
> + vcc1-supply = <&cpu_supply1>;
> + vcc2-supply = <&cpu_supply2>;
This may just be an example, but a CA7 doesn't have 3 supply rails.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-14 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 12:01 [PATCH 00/16] PM / OPP: multiple regulators & opp-transition support Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:01 ` [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Viresh Kumar
2015-09-14 20:22 ` Rob Herring [this message]
[not found] ` <55F72C97.2030306-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15 2:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-08 9:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-16 0:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-16 6:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-16 19:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-17 4:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-21 13:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-22 16:39 ` Mark Brown
2015-10-27 8:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-28 8:17 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20151028081742.GC28319-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-29 23:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-03-01 15:09 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-03-02 2:50 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02 10:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-03-02 11:24 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02 15:26 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-03-02 15:30 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02 15:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-10-22 16:30 ` Mark Brown
2015-09-11 12:01 ` [PATCH 02/16] PM / OPP: Add 'opp-microvolt-triplets' binding Viresh Kumar
2015-09-14 20:30 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-15 3:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-19 15:39 ` Mark Brown
2015-09-11 12:01 ` [PATCH 03/16] PM / OPP: Improve debug print messages with pr_fmt Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 04/16] PM / OPP: Rename routines specific to old bindings with _v1 Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 05/16] PM / OPP: Parse all power-supply related bindings together Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 06/16] PM / OPP: Create separate structure for regulator/supplies Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 07/16] PM / OPP: Add multiple regulators support Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 08/16] PM / OPP: get/put regulators from OPP core Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 09/16] PM / OPP: Disable OPPs that aren't supported by the regulators Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 10/16] PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 11/16] PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency() Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 12/16] PM / OPP: Parse clock and voltage tolerance for v1 bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 13/16] PM / OPP: Manage device clk as well Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 14/16] PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() to specify regulator Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 15/16] PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2015-09-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 16/16] PM / OPP: don't print error message for deferred probing Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F72C97.2030306@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).