From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Saravana Kannan Subject: Re: System will not suspend with highest numbered CPU offline [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:43:22 -0700 Message-ID: <561C0D5A.1040008@codeaurora.org> References: <001401d0e691$302127b0$90637710$@net> <20150908024014.GD26760@linux> <55F33D07.5090107@codeaurora.org> <2418240.peTGggLtDn@vostro.rjw.lan> <55F35092.7090207@codeaurora.org> <20151011094723.GA5386@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:41616 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024AbbJLTnY (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:43:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151011094723.GA5386@linux> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Doug Smythies , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2015 02:47 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 11-09-15, 15:07, Saravana Kannan wrote: >> Good to see some support. I do know Viresh doesn't like this :) > > Sorry for catching up late, but looks like you guys did convince me on > this. Did I also convince you about allowing changing of parameters for offline CPUs? Which would also include inactive policies? > > Let me get some patches out :) > Thanks! -Saravana -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project