From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Saravana Kannan Subject: Re: System will not suspend with highest numbered CPU offline [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:23:40 -0700 Message-ID: <561D5A3C.4080504@codeaurora.org> References: <001401d0e691$302127b0$90637710$@net> <20150908024014.GD26760@linux> <55F33D07.5090107@codeaurora.org> <2418240.peTGggLtDn@vostro.rjw.lan> <55F35092.7090207@codeaurora.org> <20151011094723.GA5386@linux> <561C0D5A.1040008@codeaurora.org> <20151013034755.GS5386@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:38586 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752456AbbJMTXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:23:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151013034755.GS5386@linux> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Doug Smythies , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 10/12/2015 08:47 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-10-15, 12:43, Saravana Kannan wrote: >> Did I also convince you about allowing changing of parameters for >> offline CPUs? Which would also include inactive policies? > > Yes, but that requires some careful modification of the code as there > are various paths of the sysfs write path. And we need to see that we > don't do anything more than just updating the files. So, I left it for > now. > Agreed. It's non-trivial and we can do that separately. -Saravana -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project