From: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] power: bq27xxx_battery: fix defined but not used warnings
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:33:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56251B64.7080104@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151019093721.GA11028@earth>
On 10/19/2015 04:37 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:01:33AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 10/16/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> On Friday 16 October 2015 15:44:12 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>>> If BQ27XXX is enabled, but neither I2C based initialization, nor
>>>> platform based initialization are activated, bq27xxx_powersupply_init
>>>> and bq27xxx_powersupply_unregister are defined but not used.
>>>>
>>>> This configuration doesn't make sense, but there is no easy way
>>>> to make it unavailable in the build system, so just mark the
>>>> functions as __maybe_unused instead.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What about?
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_1) || defined(CONFIG_2)
>>> #define NEED_POWER_SUPPLY
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> And then wrap power supply code into #ifdef NEED_POWER_SUPPLY?
>
> I thought about wrapping the whole code in an ifdef, but I don't
> think compiling an empty file is any better than adding the
> __maybe_unused flag.
>
>> We would need to wrap everything in that then, so without I2C or
>> platform enabled we end up compiling an empty file. I think the
>> better fix would be to modify the Kconfig, something like:
>
> Handling this in Kconfig is preferred of course.
>
>> config BATTERY_BQ27XXX
>> tristate
>> depends on (BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C || BATTERY_BQ27XXX_PLATFORM)
>> default y
>>
>> config BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C
>> bool "BQ27200/BQ27500 support"
>> depends on I2C
>> help
>> Say Y here to enable support for batteries with BQ27x00 (I2C) chips.
>>
>> config BATTERY_BQ27XXX_PLATFORM
>> bool "BQ27000 support"
>> help
>> Say Y here to enable support for batteries with BQ27000 (HDQ) chips.
>>
>> This would be more in line with how other multi-bus devices handle
>> this issue when nether bus is selected.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, this way it's impossible to build the code as
> module. You need to move the tristate to the individual bus options.
> This would require to split the code, so that two separate modules
> are built. I checked the tree and found a few examples:
>
> * building one modules for each bus, core support is autoselected, but always built-in
> - BMP085
>
> * building a core modules + one module for each bus
> - AD525X_DPOT
> - ADE7854
> - ADT7316
> - INPUT_AD714X
> - INPUT_ADXL34X
> - TOUCHSCREEN_AD7879
> - TOUCHSCREEN_CYTTSP_CORE
> - TOUCHSCREEN_CYTTSP4_CORE
>
> Instead of restructuring the whole driver, we could also just built
> the platform code unconditionally. The platform specific code is
> just a probe + remove function and bq27xxx_battery_platform_read().
> The last one could be dropped, if the pdata->read function is
> modified (effectively moving the code into the w1 driver).
>
> -- Sebastian
>
A quick test shows the following Kconfig to work as desired, selecting one
or both buses as modules builds the driver as a module, if ether are
selected as built-in the whole driver is built-in.
config BATTERY_BQ27XXX
tristate
depends on (BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C || BATTERY_BQ27XXX_PLATFORM)
default y
config BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C
tristate "BQ27xxx I2C support"
depends on I2C
help
Say Y here to enable support for batteries with BQ27xxx (I2C) chips.
config BATTERY_BQ27XXX_PLATFORM
tristate "BQ27xxx HDQ support"
help
Say Y here to enable support for batteries with BQ27xxx (HDQ) chips.
We would then have to change:
#ifdef CONFIG_BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C
to
#if defined(CONFIG_BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C) || defined(CONFIG_BATTERY_BQ27XXX_I2C_MODULE)
(same for CONFIG_BATTERY_BQ27XXX_PLATFORM)
--
Andrew F. Davis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-16 13:44 [PATCH 0/3] power: bq27xxx: Fix multiple defined but not used warnings Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-16 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] power: bq27xxx_battery: fix platform probe Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-16 14:47 ` Pali Rohár
2015-10-16 14:53 ` Andrew F. Davis
2015-10-16 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] power: bq27xxx_battery: move irq handler to i2c section Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-16 14:48 ` Pali Rohár
2015-10-16 15:06 ` Andrew F. Davis
2015-10-16 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] power: bq27xxx_battery: fix defined but not used warnings Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-16 14:47 ` Pali Rohár
2015-10-16 15:01 ` Andrew F. Davis
2015-10-19 9:37 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-19 16:33 ` Andrew F. Davis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56251B64.7080104@ti.com \
--to=afd@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).