From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates@intel.com>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq, intel_pstate, Fix limits->max_policy_pct rounding error
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:10:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564F37C8.60307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151120131833.GD3957@ubuntu>
On 11/20/2015 08:18 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-11-15, 07:32, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> I have a Intel (6,63) processor with a "marketing" frequency (from
>> /proc/cpuinfo) of 2100MHz, and a max turbo frequency of 2600MHz. I
>> can execute
>>
>> cpupower frequency-set -g powersave --min 1200MHz --max 2100MHz
>>
>> and the max_freq_pct is set to 80. When adding load to the system I noticed
>> that the cpu frequency only reached 2000MHZ and not 2100MHz as expected.
>>
>> This is because limits->max_policy_pct is calculated as 2100 * 100 /2600 = 80.7
>> and is rounded down to 80 when it should be rounded up to 81. This patch
>> adds a DIV_ROUND_UP() which will return the correct value.
>>
>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
>> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates@intel.com>
>> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> index 001a532..6b63374 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> @@ -1110,6 +1110,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> limits->min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->min_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
>> limits->max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>
> Forgot to remove this line ?
>
>> limits->max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->max_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
>
> And put this after the later one ?
>
>> + limits->max_policy_pct = DIV_ROUND_UP(policy->max * 100,
>> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
>>
>> /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */
>> limits->min_perf_pct = max(limits->min_policy_pct,
>
> Sure you tested it ? :)
Oops -- and yeah, tested. It works because I rewrite the value of
max_policy_pct :). I'll repost shortly.
P.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-20 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 12:32 [PATCH 0/2 v2] cpufreq, intel_pstate, Fix rounding errors Prarit Bhargava
2015-11-20 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq, intel_pstate, Fix limits->max_policy_pct rounding error Prarit Bhargava
2015-11-20 13:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-20 15:10 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2015-11-20 15:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-20 15:43 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-11-20 20:02 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2015-11-20 23:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-11-20 23:57 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2015-11-20 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq, intel_pstate, fix limits->max_perf " Prarit Bhargava
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-20 23:47 [PATCH 0/2 v3] cpufreq, intel_pstate, Fix rounding errors Prarit Bhargava
2015-11-20 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq, intel_pstate, Fix limits->max_policy_pct rounding error Prarit Bhargava
2015-11-21 0:04 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564F37C8.60307@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandra.yates@intel.com \
--cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).