From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: blackfin-cpufreq: How to mark cpu_set_cclk() as static?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:00:20 +0100
Message-ID: <5677CDB4.2020608@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <5674598B.6020000@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20151219015926.GJ3946@ubuntu> <5675141F.2090803@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20151221031757.GA5532@ubuntu> <5677C452.8040307@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20151221092805.GD5532@ubuntu> <5677CB72.8090504@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20151221095308.GE5532@ubuntu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151221095308.GE5532@ubuntu>
Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

> I think the first patch is already Acked now and can be applied
> as it is. Just send the next patch based on the previous one.

Does it matter to provide the proposed changes as a tiny patch series
with two update steps?

Regards,
Markus