linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:25:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A0A424.80306@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601201847050.3575@nanos>

On 01/20/2016 06:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIMINGS
>> +/**
>> + * struct irqt_ops - structure to be used by the subsystem to track
>> + *                   irq timings
>> + * @alloc:    called when an irqdesc is allocated
>> + * @free:     called when an irqdesc is free
>> + * @setup:    called when an irq is setup, this is called under lock
>> + * @remove:   called when an irq is removed
>> + * @handler:  called when an interrupt is handled
>> + */
>> +struct irqtimings_ops {
>> +	int (*alloc)(unsigned int);
>> +	void (*free)(unsigned int);
>> +	int (*setup)(unsigned int, struct irqaction *act);
>> +	void (*remove)(unsigned int, void *dev_id);
>> +	irqt_handler_t handler;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * This macro *must* be used by the subsystem interested by the irq
>> + * timing information.
>> + */
>> +#define DECLARE_IRQ_TIMINGS(__ops)				\
>> +	const struct irqtimings_ops *__irqtimings = __ops;
>> +#endif
>
>> @@ -20,6 +20,49 @@ extern bool noirqdebug;
>>
>>   extern struct irqaction chained_action;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIMINGS
>> +
>> +extern const struct irqtimings_ops *__irqtimings;
>> +
>> +static inline int alloc_irqtiming(unsigned int irq)
>> +{
>> +	if (__irqtimings->alloc)
>> +		return __irqtimings->alloc(irq);
>
> I really have a hard time to understand that indirection. __irqtimings is
> statically allocated and compiled in. There can be only one user for this in
> the system ever and that user has all callbacks populated.
>
> Why can't you spare all that pointer muck and simply have:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIMINGS
> int irqtiming_alloc(usigned int irq);
> ....
> #else
> static int irqtiming_alloc(usigned int irq) { return 0; }
> ...
> #endif
>
> and implement those functions in your idle thingy?

Hi Thomas,

yes sure, I can do something simpler.

Just to be sure, do you suggest to put the function declaration in 
kernel/irq/internal.h and the function definition in 
kernel/sched/idle-sched.c ?

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-21  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06 15:22 [RFC PATCH 0/2] IRQ based next prediction Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-06 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-08 15:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 11:42     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-06 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-06 17:40   ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-07 15:42     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 19:27       ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-10 22:37     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-10 22:46       ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-10 22:58         ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-10 23:13           ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-08 15:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 12:41     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 13:42       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 14:16         ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 14:26           ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 14:52             ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 15:12               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 16:04                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-13  9:17                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-18 13:21     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 15:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 16:00         ` [RFC V2 0/2] IRQ based next prediction Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00           ` [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 17:55             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21  9:25               ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2016-01-21 10:27                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 19:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:57               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 20:04                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 20:20                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 20:22                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21  9:50                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 10:08                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 12:38                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 20:27                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 13:52                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 14:19                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 18:56                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-22 10:15                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21  9:26               ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 19:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21  9:53               ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00           ` [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 17:46             ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 18:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 10:03               ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 19:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:17               ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 19:29                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:34             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:40             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:57               ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 20:22                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:49             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 13:54               ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 14:12                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 16:00           ` [RFC V2 0/2] IRQ based next prediction Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00           ` [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00           ` [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 20:14             ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-21 13:04               ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A0A424.80306@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).