linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy()
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:41:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CB9C95.2090805@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c94ae8c4f0c9cf30d916aa29a339b793db30aa3a.1456117057.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>



On 02/21/2016 08:57 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The intel-pstate driver is using intel_pstate_hwp_set() from two
> separate paths, i.e. ->set_policy() callback and sysfs update path for
> the files present in /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/ directory.
>
> While an update to the sysfs path applies to all the CPUs being managed
> by the driver (which essentially means all the online CPUs), the update
> via the ->set_policy() callback applies to a smaller group of CPUs
> managed by the policy for which ->set_policy() is called.
>
> And so, intel_pstate_hwp_set() should update frequencies of only the
> CPUs that are part of policy->cpus mask, while it is called from
> ->set_policy() callback.
>
> In order to do that, add a parameter (cpumask) to intel_pstate_hwp_set()
> and apply the frequency changes only to the concerned CPUs.
>
> For ->set_policy() path, we are only concerned about policy->cpus, and
> so policy->rwsem lock taken by the core prior to calling ->set_policy()
> is enough to take care of any races. The larger lock acquired by
> get_online_cpus() is required only for the updates to sysfs files.
>
> Add another routine, intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus(), and call it
> from the sysfs update paths.
>
> This also fixes a lockdep reported recently, where policy->rwsem and
> get_online_cpus() could have been acquired in any order causing an ABBA
> deadlock. The sequence of events leading to that was:
>
> intel_pstate_init(...)
> 	...cpufreq_online(...)
> 		down_write(&policy->rwsem); // Locks policy->rwsem
> 		...
> 		cpufreq_init_policy(policy);
> 			...intel_pstate_hwp_set();
> 				get_online_cpus(); // Temporarily locks cpu_hotplug.lock
> 		...
> 		up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> pm_suspend(...)
> 	...disable_nonboot_cpus()
> 		_cpu_down()
> 			cpu_hotplug_begin(); // Locks cpu_hotplug.lock
> 			__cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE, ...);
> 				...cpufreq_offline_prepare();
> 					down_write(&policy->rwsem); // Locks policy->rwsem
>
> Reported-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index f4d85c2ae7b1..2e7058a2479d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static inline void update_turbo_state(void)
>   		 cpu->pstate.max_pstate == cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate);
>   }
>   
> -static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(void)
> +static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
>   {
>   	int min, hw_min, max, hw_max, cpu, range, adj_range;
>   	u64 value, cap;
> @@ -297,9 +297,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(void)
>   	hw_max = HWP_HIGHEST_PERF(cap);
>   	range = hw_max - hw_min;
>   
> -	get_online_cpus();
> -
> -	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
>   		rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, &value);
>   		adj_range = limits->min_perf_pct * range / 100;
>   		min = hw_min + adj_range;
> @@ -318,7 +316,12 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(void)
>   		value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(max);
>   		wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value);
>   	}
> +}
>   
> +static void intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus(void)
> +{
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	intel_pstate_hwp_set(cpu_online_mask);
>   	put_online_cpus();
>   }
>   
> @@ -440,7 +443,7 @@ static ssize_t store_no_turbo(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,
>   	limits->no_turbo = clamp_t(int, input, 0, 1);
>   
>   	if (hwp_active)
> -		intel_pstate_hwp_set();
> +		intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus();
>   
>   	return count;
>   }
> @@ -466,7 +469,7 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,
>   				  int_tofp(100));
>   
>   	if (hwp_active)
> -		intel_pstate_hwp_set();
> +		intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus();
>   	return count;
>   }
>   
> @@ -491,7 +494,7 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,
>   				  int_tofp(100));
>   
>   	if (hwp_active)
> -		intel_pstate_hwp_set();
> +		intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus();
>   	return count;
>   }
>   
> @@ -1112,7 +1115,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>   		pr_debug("intel_pstate: set performance\n");
>   		limits = &performance_limits;
>   		if (hwp_active)
> -			intel_pstate_hwp_set();
> +			intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpus);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1144,7 +1147,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>   				  int_tofp(100));
>   
>   	if (hwp_active)
> -		intel_pstate_hwp_set();
> +		intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpus);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }


      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22  4:57 [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22  9:33 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-02-22 10:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2016-02-22 11:27   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 12:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-22 18:19       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-02-22 23:41 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CB9C95.2090805@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).