From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] clk: samsung: exynos542x: Add the clock id for ACLK Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:28:17 +0900 Message-ID: <570F3881.9000100@samsung.com> References: <1460091646-28701-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <1460091646-28701-6-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <570CDB16.2050001@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Kukjin Kim , Sylwester Nawrocki , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , linux.amoon@gmail.com, m.reichl@fivetechno.de, Tobias Jakobi , InKi Dae , linux-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi Tomasz and Krzysztof, On 2016=EB=85=84 04=EC=9B=94 13=EC=9D=BC 15:20, Tomasz Figa wrote: > 2016-04-12 14:25 GMT+03:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski : >> On 04/08/2016 07:00 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> This patch adds the clock id for ACLK clock which is source clock o= f AMBA AXI >>> Bus. This clock should be handled in Bus frequency scaling driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++-= ------------ >>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> >> The IDs itself look good but you are not adding only clock ID. You a= re >> changing all of them from NULL-flags to CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT. This sh= ould >> be explained in the commit message why you need it. Probably it shou= ld >> be also in separate commit. >=20 > +1. And CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT for a clock which has a mux as its parent > is a bit suspicious, so I'd like to know the rationale for each singl= e > clock with CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT being added. This patch don't need the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag. As Tomasz's comment= , the mux of divider's parent don't need this flag. Sorry for confusion. I'll drop the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi