linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cpufreq-4.7] New schedutil governor in combination with intel_pstate/x86
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 01:18:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573BA6C6.901@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUVXffgzNBAMHUdzHzX3pSDm8j=Uq3CAK8zVqsdT0UunNw@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/18/2016 1:16 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On 5/17/16, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 5/17/2016 5:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi,
>>
>> You have a broken address of linux-pm (it leads to nowhere).
>>
> Grrr, yeah you are right.
>
>>> I wonder if the Kconfig logic is correct when using
>>> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=y in combination with
>>> intel_pstate driver for X86 architecture
>>>
>>> The available scaling-governors for intel_pstate are: performance
>>> powersave.
>>>
>>> Only acpi-cpufreq can use the new schedutil governor.
>> The right way to say that would be that intel_pstate doesn't work with
>> cpufreq governors.
>>
>> scalling_governor is just used by intel_pstate as an interface for
>> choosing the mode it works in and it always uses its own built-in
>> "governor".  And BTW, intel_pstate "powersave" is not the same as the
>> cpufreq's "powersave" even.
>>
>>> Shouldn't it be prevented from selecting schedutil governor as default
>>> when CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y is set?
>> That should apply to "ondemand" too and it doesn't, so no.
>>
>> "schedutil" is just a regular cpufreq governor and it doesn't care about
>> intel_pstate.
>>
>>> It makes no real sense to me.
>>>
>>> Ubuntu has in it's kernels CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y.
>>>
>>> What are the alternatives?
>>> Set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE=y.
>> You can choose every cpufreq governor as the default.  There are 6 of
>> then now in the tree.
>>
>>> BTW, I cannot change my scaling-driver...
>>> ...intel_pstate -> acpi-cpufreq...
>>>
>>> root# for p in policy0 policy1 policy2 policy3 ; do LC_ALL=C echo -n
>>> acpi-cpufreq > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/${p}/scaling_driver ;
>>> done
>>>
>>> Attached is also a modified /etc/init.d/ondemand script from my
>>> Ubuntu/precise AMD64 to use and fallback to schedutil governor.
>> No, you can't change the scaling driver this way.
>>
>> It actually is not possible to change from intel_pstate to anything else
>> now.  To run without intel_pstate, you need to add
>> "intel_pstate=disable" to the kernel command line.
>>
> OK, I will try intel_pstate=disable in my k-c-l.
>
> Is there no way to switch between acpi-cpufreq and intel_pstate on the fly?

No, there's no way to do that ATM.

> Did not look in the Kconfig sections...
> Can I built both as modules?
> Then unload and load the other?

No, intel_pstate can't be built as a module.

Thanks,
Rafael


  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-17 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CA+icZUV0Mxu+fvrmpJmnDjLmxpSd83hDM5od0_1kw4gEm5aaEw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <573B4C2A.4010205@intel.com>
2016-05-17 23:16   ` [cpufreq-4.7] New schedutil governor in combination with intel_pstate/x86 Sedat Dilek
2016-05-17 23:18     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-05-19 11:04       ` Sedat Dilek
2016-05-19 11:54         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]           ` <CA+icZUXV3mz9Yr05o5zHLOcXwYRWydtXZOuLnE10Zy3RwzOHUg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-19 12:53             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 13:41               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-05-19 13:46                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 13:54                   ` Sedat Dilek
2016-05-19 14:04                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 14:24                       ` Sedat Dilek
2016-05-19 14:25                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 14:24                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 14:50                         ` Sedat Dilek
2016-05-19 16:05                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 16:16                             ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573BA6C6.901@intel.com \
    --to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).