From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Remove incorrect IS_ERR()
 check
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:57:44 +0900
Message-ID: <5746D6A8.2030400@samsung.com>
References: <CGME20160526064612epcas1p4cb0d45fa11deafea51fa84974132afed@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
 <20160526064541.GA6680@mwanda> <5746AFE3.6030606@samsung.com>
 <20160526100238.GN11011@mwanda> <5746CCE3.5010701@samsung.com>
 <20160526105135.GC10957@mwanda>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <20160526105135.GC10957@mwanda>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On 2016=EB=85=84 05=EC=9B=94 26=EC=9D=BC 19:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Signed-off-by is like signing a legal document to say that you haven'=
t
> stolen any of the code from SCO Unix.  Please don't put sign for othe=
r
> people.

You're right. I'm forcing to put the Sign-off. It is just example.

But, I still think that patch description including the engineer's name=
 is not appropriate
to give the credit someone.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi