From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [patch v2] PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Remove incorrect IS_ERR() check Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:01:01 +0900 Message-ID: <5746D76D.9060802@samsung.com> References: <20160526064541.GA6680@mwanda> <5746AFE3.6030606@samsung.com> <20160526100238.GN11011@mwanda> <5746CCE3.5010701@samsung.com> <20160526105135.GC10957@mwanda> <5746D6A8.2030400@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:38656 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751627AbcEZLBE (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2016 07:01:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <5746D6A8.2030400@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Julia Lawall , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 2016=EB=85=84 05=EC=9B=94 26=EC=9D=BC 19:57, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 2016=EB=85=84 05=EC=9B=94 26=EC=9D=BC 19:51, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> Signed-off-by is like signing a legal document to say that you haven= 't >> stolen any of the code from SCO Unix. Please don't put sign for oth= er >> people. >=20 > You're right. I'm forcing to put the Sign-off. It is just example. >=20 > But, I still think that patch description including the engineer's na= me is not appropriate > to give the credit someone. >=20 Also, If Julia review this patch, you just can add the reviewed-by tag. I think that it is enough. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi