* [PATCH v4 00/10] powerpc/powernv/cpuidle: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
@ 2016-05-24 13:15 Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-05-24 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: " Shreyas B. Prabhu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shreyas B. Prabhu @ 2016-05-24 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe
Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel, mikey, ego, maddy,
Shreyas B. Prabhu, Rafael J. Wysocki, Daniel Lezcano, linux-pm
POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
a) new instruction named stop is added. This instruction replaces
instructions like nap, sleep, rvwinkle.
b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
of stop instruction.
PSSCR has following key fields
Bits 0:3 - Power-Saving Level Status. This field indicates the
lowest power-saving state the thread entered since stop
instruction was last executed.
Bit 42 - Enable State Loss
0 - No state is lost irrespective of other fields
1 - Allows state loss
Bits 44:47 - Power-Saving Level Limit
This limits the power-saving level that can be entered into.
Bits 60:63 - Requested Level
Used to specify which power-saving level must be entered on
executing stop instruction
Stop idle states and their properties like name, latency, target
residency, psscr value are exposed via device tree.
This patch series adds support for this new mechanism.
Patches 1-7 are cleanups and code movement.
Patch 8 adds platform specific support for stop and psscr handling.
Patch 9 adds cpuidle driver support.
Patch 10 makes offlined cpu use deepest stop state.
Changes in v4
=============
- Added a patch to use PNV_THREAD_WINKLE macro while requesting for winkle
- Moved power7_powersave_common rename to more appropriate patch
- renaming power7_enter_nap_mode to pnv_enter_arch207_idle_mode
- Added PSSCR layout to Patch 7's commit message
- Improved / Fixed comments
- Fixed whitespace error in paca.h
- Using MAX_POSSIBLE_STOP_STATE macro instead of hardcoding 0xF has
max possible stop state
Changes in v3
=============
- Rebased on powerpc-next
- Dropping patch 1 since we are not adding a new file for P9 idle support
- Improved comments in multiple places
- Moved GET_PACA from power7_restore_hyp_resource to System Reset
- Instead of moving few functions from idle_power7 to idle_power_common,
renaming idle_power7.S to idle_power_common.S
- Moved HSTATE_HWTHREAD_STATE updation to power_powersave_common
- Dropped earlier patch 5 which moved few macros from idle_power_common to
asm/cpuidle.h.
- Added a patch to rename reusable power7_* idle functions to pnv_*
- Added new patch that creates abstraction for saving SPRs before
entering deep idle states
- Instead of introducing new file idle_power_stop.S, P9 idle support
is added to idle_power_common.S using CPU_FTR sections.
- Fixed r4 reg clobbering in power_stop0
Changes in v2
=============
- Rebased on v4.6-rc6
- Using CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 bit instead of CPU_FTR_STOP_INST
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Shreyas B. Prabhu (10):
powerpc/powernv: Use PNV_THREAD_WINKLE macro while requesting for
winkle
powerpc/kvm: make hypervisor state restore a function
powerpc/powernv: Rename idle_power7.S to idle_power_common.S
powerpc/powernv: Rename reusable idle functions to hardware agnostic
names
powerpc/powernv: Make pnv_powersave_common more generic
powerpc/powernv: abstraction for saving SPRs before entering deep idle
states
powerpc/powernv: set power_save func after the idle states are
initialized
powerpc/powernv: Add platform support for stop instruction
cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
powerpc/powernv: Use deepest stop state when cpu is offlined
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 2 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h | 11 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h | 2 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 4 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 11 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 30 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power7.S | 515 -----------------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power_common.S | 662 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 4 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 98 ++++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c | 4 +-
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 57 ++-
19 files changed, 850 insertions(+), 561 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power7.S
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power_common.S
--
2.4.11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
2016-05-24 13:15 [PATCH v4 00/10] powerpc/powernv/cpuidle: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states Shreyas B. Prabhu
@ 2016-05-24 13:15 ` Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-05-30 14:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shreyas B. Prabhu @ 2016-05-24 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe
Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel, mikey, ego, maddy,
Shreyas B. Prabhu, Rafael J. Wysocki, Daniel Lezcano, linux-pm
POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
a) new instruction named stop is added.
b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
of stop instruction.
Supported idle states and value to be written to PSSCR register to enter
any idle state is exposed via ibm,cpu-idle-state-names and
ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr respectively. To enter an idle state,
platform provided power_stop() needs to be invoked with the appropriate
PSSCR value.
This patch adds support for this new mechanism in cpuidle powernv driver.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
- No changes since v1
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
index e12dc30..efe5221 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <asm/runlatch.h>
#define MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES 8
+#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN 10
struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
.name = "powernv_idle",
@@ -29,9 +30,11 @@ struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
static int max_idle_state;
static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
+
+static u64 stop_psscr_table[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
+
static u64 snooze_timeout;
static bool snooze_timeout_en;
-
static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
int index)
@@ -139,6 +142,15 @@ static struct notifier_block setup_hotplug_notifier = {
.notifier_call = powernv_cpuidle_add_cpu_notifier,
};
+static int stop_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
+ struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+ int index)
+{
+ ppc64_runlatch_off();
+ power_stop(stop_psscr_table[index]);
+ ppc64_runlatch_on();
+ return index;
+}
/*
* powernv_cpuidle_driver_init()
*/
@@ -169,6 +181,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
int dt_idle_states;
u32 *latency_ns, *residency_ns, *flags;
+ u64 *psscr_val = NULL;
+ const char *names[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
int i, rc;
/* Currently we have snooze statically defined */
@@ -201,6 +215,23 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
goto out_free_latency;
}
+ rc = of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
+ "ibm,cpu-idle-state-names", names, dt_idle_states);
+ if (rc < -1) {
+ pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-names in DT\n");
+ goto out_free_latency;
+ }
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+ psscr_val = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_val),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ rc = of_property_read_u64_array(power_mgt,
+ "ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr", psscr_val, dt_idle_states);
+ if (rc < -1) {
+ pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-psscr in DT\n");
+ goto out_free_psscr;
+ }
+ }
residency_ns = kzalloc(sizeof(*residency_ns) * dt_idle_states, GFP_KERNEL);
rc = of_property_read_u32_array(power_mgt,
"ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns", residency_ns, dt_idle_states);
@@ -218,6 +249,16 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 100;
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &nap_loop;
+ } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_FAST) &&
+ !(flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
+ strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
+ (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
+ strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
+ (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
+ powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
+
+ powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
+ stop_psscr_table[nr_idle_states] = psscr_val[i];
}
/*
@@ -233,6 +274,18 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 300000;
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &fastsleep_loop;
+ } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_DEEP) &&
+ (flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
+
+ strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
+ (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
+ strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
+ (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
+
+ powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
+
+ powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
+ stop_psscr_table[nr_idle_states] = psscr_val[i];
}
#endif
powernv_states[nr_idle_states].exit_latency =
@@ -247,6 +300,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
}
kfree(residency_ns);
+out_free_psscr:
+ kfree(psscr_val);
out_free_latency:
kfree(latency_ns);
out_free_flags:
--
2.4.11
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
2016-05-24 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: " Shreyas B. Prabhu
@ 2016-05-30 14:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2016-05-30 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shreyas B. Prabhu, mpe
Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel, mikey, ego, maddy,
Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, Rob Herring, Lorenzo Pieralisi
On 05/24/2016 03:15 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
> a) new instruction named stop is added.
> b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
> of stop instruction.
>
> Supported idle states and value to be written to PSSCR register to enter
> any idle state is exposed via ibm,cpu-idle-state-names and
> ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr respectively. To enter an idle state,
> platform provided power_stop() needs to be invoked with the appropriate
> PSSCR value.
>
> This patch adds support for this new mechanism in cpuidle powernv driver.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> - No changes since v1
>
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
> index e12dc30..efe5221 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <asm/runlatch.h>
>
> #define MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES 8
> +#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN 10
Why not reuse cpuidle constants even if they are slightly different ?
#define CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX 10
#define CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN 16
> struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
> .name = "powernv_idle",
> @@ -29,9 +30,11 @@ struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>
> static int max_idle_state;
> static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
> +
> +static u64 stop_psscr_table[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
> +
> static u64 snooze_timeout;
> static bool snooze_timeout_en;
> -
> static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> int index)
> @@ -139,6 +142,15 @@ static struct notifier_block setup_hotplug_notifier = {
> .notifier_call = powernv_cpuidle_add_cpu_notifier,
> };
>
> +static int stop_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> + int index)
> +{
> + ppc64_runlatch_off();
> + power_stop(stop_psscr_table[index]);
> + ppc64_runlatch_on();
> + return index;
> +}
> /*
> * powernv_cpuidle_driver_init()
> */
> @@ -169,6 +181,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
> int dt_idle_states;
> u32 *latency_ns, *residency_ns, *flags;
> + u64 *psscr_val = NULL;
> + const char *names[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
> int i, rc;
>
> /* Currently we have snooze statically defined */
> @@ -201,6 +215,23 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> goto out_free_latency;
> }
>
> + rc = of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-names", names, dt_idle_states);
> + if (rc < -1) {
Why < -1 ?
> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-names in DT\n");
> + goto out_free_latency;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
Isn't weird to mix cpu feature and DT bindings check ?
> + psscr_val = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_val),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + rc = of_property_read_u64_array(power_mgt,
> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr", psscr_val, dt_idle_states);
[cc'ed Lorenzo and Rob ]
I don't see the documentation for the binding. Wouldn't make sense to
add the value per idle state instead of an index based array ?
> + if (rc < -1) {
> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-psscr in DT\n");
> + goto out_free_psscr;
> + }
> + }
> residency_ns = kzalloc(sizeof(*residency_ns) * dt_idle_states, GFP_KERNEL);
> rc = of_property_read_u32_array(power_mgt,
> "ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns", residency_ns, dt_idle_states);
> @@ -218,6 +249,16 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 100;
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &nap_loop;
> + } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_FAST) &&
> + !(flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
Why cast names[] to (char *) while strncpy is waiting for const char *,
the initial type of names[] ?
> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
No target_residency specified ?
> +
> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
s/&stop_loop/stop_loop/
> + stop_psscr_table[nr_idle_states] = psscr_val[i];
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -233,6 +274,18 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 300000;
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &fastsleep_loop;
> + } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_DEEP) &&
> + (flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
> +
> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
> +
> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
> +
> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
> + stop_psscr_table[nr_idle_states] = psscr_val[i];
> }
> #endif
> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].exit_latency =
> @@ -247,6 +300,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> }
>
> kfree(residency_ns);
> +out_free_psscr:
> + kfree(psscr_val);
> out_free_latency:
> kfree(latency_ns);
> out_free_flags:
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
2016-05-30 14:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shreyas B Prabhu @ 2016-05-31 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Lezcano, mpe
Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel, mikey, ego, maddy,
Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, Rob Herring, Lorenzo Pieralisi
Hi Daniel,
On 05/30/2016 07:56 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 03:15 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>> POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
>> a) new instruction named stop is added.
>> b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
>> of stop instruction.
>>
>> Supported idle states and value to be written to PSSCR register to enter
>> any idle state is exposed via ibm,cpu-idle-state-names and
>> ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr respectively. To enter an idle state,
>> platform provided power_stop() needs to be invoked with the appropriate
>> PSSCR value.
>>
>> This patch adds support for this new mechanism in cpuidle powernv driver.
>>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> - No changes since v1
>>
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 57
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> index e12dc30..efe5221 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include <asm/runlatch.h>
>>
>> #define MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES 8
>> +#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN 10
>
> Why not reuse cpuidle constants even if they are slightly different ?
>
> #define CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX 10
> #define CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN 16
>
I'll reuse the them.
>> struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>> .name = "powernv_idle",
>> @@ -29,9 +30,11 @@ struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>>
>> static int max_idle_state;
>> static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
>> +
>> +static u64 stop_psscr_table[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
>> +
>> static u64 snooze_timeout;
>> static bool snooze_timeout_en;
>> -
>> static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> int index)
>> @@ -139,6 +142,15 @@ static struct notifier_block
>> setup_hotplug_notifier = {
>> .notifier_call = powernv_cpuidle_add_cpu_notifier,
>> };
>>
>> +static int stop_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> + struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> + int index)
>> +{
>> + ppc64_runlatch_off();
>> + power_stop(stop_psscr_table[index]);
>> + ppc64_runlatch_on();
>> + return index;
>> +}
>> /*
>> * powernv_cpuidle_driver_init()
>> */
>> @@ -169,6 +181,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
>> int dt_idle_states;
>> u32 *latency_ns, *residency_ns, *flags;
>> + u64 *psscr_val = NULL;
>> + const char *names[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
>> int i, rc;
>>
>> /* Currently we have snooze statically defined */
>> @@ -201,6 +215,23 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> goto out_free_latency;
>> }
>>
>> + rc = of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
>> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-names", names, dt_idle_states);
>> + if (rc < -1) {
>
> Why < -1 ?
>
Oversight. I'll fix this.
>> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-names
>> in DT\n");
>> + goto out_free_latency;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
>
> Isn't weird to mix cpu feature and DT bindings check ?
>
Hmm. I'll add a compatible node in DT to avoid mixing cpu_has_feature
check and DT bindings.
>> + psscr_val = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_val),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + rc = of_property_read_u64_array(power_mgt,
>> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr", psscr_val, dt_idle_states);
>
> [cc'ed Lorenzo and Rob ]
>
> I don't see the documentation for the binding. Wouldn't make sense to
> add the value per idle state instead of an index based array ?
>
Existing hardware (POWER7 and POWER8) has been using following dt nodes
which are arrays-
ibm,cpu-idle-state-names
ibm,cpu-idle-state-latencies-ns
ibm,cpu-idle-state-flags
ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns
I extended this design and added ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr to convey the
extra information needed for POWER ISA v3.
Down the line it'll probably make better sense to expose these values
per idle state rather than arrays of individual properties. But I'd like
to hold off on making that design change yet and wait for more design
inputs from the platform side.
>> + if (rc < -1) {
>> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing
>> ibm,cpu-idle-states-psscr in DT\n");
>> + goto out_free_psscr;
>> + }
>> + }
>> residency_ns = kzalloc(sizeof(*residency_ns) * dt_idle_states,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> rc = of_property_read_u32_array(power_mgt,
>> "ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns", residency_ns,
>> dt_idle_states);
>> @@ -218,6 +249,16 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 100;
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &nap_loop;
>> + } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_FAST) &&
>> + !(flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
>> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
>> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
>
> Why cast names[] to (char *) while strncpy is waiting for const char *,
> the initial type of names[] ?
>
Oversight. Embarrassing one at that. I'll fix it.
>> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
>> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
>> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
>
> No target_residency specified ?
>
target_residency and latency are already specified in the existing code
outside this if-else block. There is no change in interpreting those nodes.
>> +
>> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
>
> s/&stop_loop/stop_loop/
I'll make the change.
Thanks a lot for the review.
-Shreyas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
2016-05-30 14:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
@ 2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
[not found] ` <201605311351.u4VDn1i7019941@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shreyas B Prabhu @ 2016-05-31 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Lezcano, mpe
Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel, mikey, ego, maddy,
Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, Rob Herring, Lorenzo Pieralisi
Hi Daniel,
On 05/30/2016 07:56 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 03:15 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>> POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
>> a) new instruction named stop is added.
>> b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
>> of stop instruction.
>>
>> Supported idle states and value to be written to PSSCR register to enter
>> any idle state is exposed via ibm,cpu-idle-state-names and
>> ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr respectively. To enter an idle state,
>> platform provided power_stop() needs to be invoked with the appropriate
>> PSSCR value.
>>
>> This patch adds support for this new mechanism in cpuidle powernv driver.
>>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> - No changes since v1
>>
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 57
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> index e12dc30..efe5221 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include <asm/runlatch.h>
>>
>> #define MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES 8
>> +#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN 10
>
> Why not reuse cpuidle constants even if they are slightly different ?
>
> #define CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX 10
> #define CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN 16
>
I'll reuse the them.
>> struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>> .name = "powernv_idle",
>> @@ -29,9 +30,11 @@ struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>>
>> static int max_idle_state;
>> static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
>> +
>> +static u64 stop_psscr_table[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
>> +
>> static u64 snooze_timeout;
>> static bool snooze_timeout_en;
>> -
>> static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> int index)
>> @@ -139,6 +142,15 @@ static struct notifier_block
>> setup_hotplug_notifier = {
>> .notifier_call = powernv_cpuidle_add_cpu_notifier,
>> };
>>
>> +static int stop_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> + struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> + int index)
>> +{
>> + ppc64_runlatch_off();
>> + power_stop(stop_psscr_table[index]);
>> + ppc64_runlatch_on();
>> + return index;
>> +}
>> /*
>> * powernv_cpuidle_driver_init()
>> */
>> @@ -169,6 +181,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
>> int dt_idle_states;
>> u32 *latency_ns, *residency_ns, *flags;
>> + u64 *psscr_val = NULL;
>> + const char *names[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
>> int i, rc;
>>
>> /* Currently we have snooze statically defined */
>> @@ -201,6 +215,23 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> goto out_free_latency;
>> }
>>
>> + rc = of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
>> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-names", names, dt_idle_states);
>> + if (rc < -1) {
>
> Why < -1 ?
>
Oversight. I'll fix this.
>> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-names
>> in DT\n");
>> + goto out_free_latency;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
>
> Isn't weird to mix cpu feature and DT bindings check ?
>
Hmm. I'll add a compatible node in DT to avoid mixing cpu_has_feature
check and DT bindings.
>> + psscr_val = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_val),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + rc = of_property_read_u64_array(power_mgt,
>> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr", psscr_val, dt_idle_states);
>
> [cc'ed Lorenzo and Rob ]
>
> I don't see the documentation for the binding. Wouldn't make sense to
> add the value per idle state instead of an index based array ?
>
Existing hardware (POWER7 and POWER8) has been using following dt nodes
which are arrays-
ibm,cpu-idle-state-names
ibm,cpu-idle-state-latencies-ns
ibm,cpu-idle-state-flags
ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns
I extended this design and added ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr to convey the
extra information needed for POWER ISA v3.
Down the line it'll probably make better sense to expose these values
per idle state rather than arrays of individual properties. But I'd like
to hold off on making that design change yet and wait for more design
inputs from the platform side.
>> + if (rc < -1) {
>> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing
>> ibm,cpu-idle-states-psscr in DT\n");
>> + goto out_free_psscr;
>> + }
>> + }
>> residency_ns = kzalloc(sizeof(*residency_ns) * dt_idle_states,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> rc = of_property_read_u32_array(power_mgt,
>> "ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns", residency_ns,
>> dt_idle_states);
>> @@ -218,6 +249,16 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 100;
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &nap_loop;
>> + } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_FAST) &&
>> + !(flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
>> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
>> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
>
> Why cast names[] to (char *) while strncpy is waiting for const char *,
> the initial type of names[] ?
>
Oversight. Embarrassing one at that. I'll fix it.
>> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
>> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
>> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
>
> No target_residency specified ?
>
target_residency and latency are already specified in the existing code
outside this if-else block. There is no change in interpreting those nodes.
>> +
>> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
>
> s/&stop_loop/stop_loop/
I'll make the change.
Thanks a lot for the review.
-Shreyas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
2016-05-30 14:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
@ 2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
[not found] ` <201605311351.u4VDn1i7019941@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shreyas B Prabhu @ 2016-05-31 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Lezcano, mpe
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel,
Rob Herring, Lorenzo Pieralisi, linuxppc-dev
Hi Daniel,
On 05/30/2016 07:56 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 03:15 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>> POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
>> a) new instruction named stop is added.
>> b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
>> of stop instruction.
>>
>> Supported idle states and value to be written to PSSCR register to enter
>> any idle state is exposed via ibm,cpu-idle-state-names and
>> ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr respectively. To enter an idle state,
>> platform provided power_stop() needs to be invoked with the appropriate
>> PSSCR value.
>>
>> This patch adds support for this new mechanism in cpuidle powernv driver.
>>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> - No changes since v1
>>
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 57
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> index e12dc30..efe5221 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include <asm/runlatch.h>
>>
>> #define MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES 8
>> +#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN 10
>
> Why not reuse cpuidle constants even if they are slightly different ?
>
> #define CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX 10
> #define CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN 16
>
I'll reuse the them.
>> struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>> .name = "powernv_idle",
>> @@ -29,9 +30,11 @@ struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
>>
>> static int max_idle_state;
>> static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
>> +
>> +static u64 stop_psscr_table[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
>> +
>> static u64 snooze_timeout;
>> static bool snooze_timeout_en;
>> -
>> static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> int index)
>> @@ -139,6 +142,15 @@ static struct notifier_block
>> setup_hotplug_notifier = {
>> .notifier_call = powernv_cpuidle_add_cpu_notifier,
>> };
>>
>> +static int stop_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> + struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> + int index)
>> +{
>> + ppc64_runlatch_off();
>> + power_stop(stop_psscr_table[index]);
>> + ppc64_runlatch_on();
>> + return index;
>> +}
>> /*
>> * powernv_cpuidle_driver_init()
>> */
>> @@ -169,6 +181,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
>> int dt_idle_states;
>> u32 *latency_ns, *residency_ns, *flags;
>> + u64 *psscr_val = NULL;
>> + const char *names[MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES];
>> int i, rc;
>>
>> /* Currently we have snooze statically defined */
>> @@ -201,6 +215,23 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> goto out_free_latency;
>> }
>>
>> + rc = of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
>> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-names", names, dt_idle_states);
>> + if (rc < -1) {
>
> Why < -1 ?
>
Oversight. I'll fix this.
>> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-states-names
>> in DT\n");
>> + goto out_free_latency;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
>
> Isn't weird to mix cpu feature and DT bindings check ?
>
Hmm. I'll add a compatible node in DT to avoid mixing cpu_has_feature
check and DT bindings.
>> + psscr_val = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_val),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + rc = of_property_read_u64_array(power_mgt,
>> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr", psscr_val, dt_idle_states);
>
> [cc'ed Lorenzo and Rob ]
>
> I don't see the documentation for the binding. Wouldn't make sense to
> add the value per idle state instead of an index based array ?
>
Existing hardware (POWER7 and POWER8) has been using following dt nodes
which are arrays-
ibm,cpu-idle-state-names
ibm,cpu-idle-state-latencies-ns
ibm,cpu-idle-state-flags
ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns
I extended this design and added ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr to convey the
extra information needed for POWER ISA v3.
Down the line it'll probably make better sense to expose these values
per idle state rather than arrays of individual properties. But I'd like
to hold off on making that design change yet and wait for more design
inputs from the platform side.
>> + if (rc < -1) {
>> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing
>> ibm,cpu-idle-states-psscr in DT\n");
>> + goto out_free_psscr;
>> + }
>> + }
>> residency_ns = kzalloc(sizeof(*residency_ns) * dt_idle_states,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> rc = of_property_read_u32_array(power_mgt,
>> "ibm,cpu-idle-state-residency-ns", residency_ns,
>> dt_idle_states);
>> @@ -218,6 +249,16 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].target_residency = 100;
>> powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &nap_loop;
>> + } else if ((flags[i] & OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_FAST) &&
>> + !(flags[i] & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP)) {
>> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].name,
>> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
>
> Why cast names[] to (char *) while strncpy is waiting for const char *,
> the initial type of names[] ?
>
Oversight. Embarrassing one at that. I'll fix it.
>> + strncpy(powernv_states[nr_idle_states].desc,
>> + (char *)names[i], MAX_IDLE_STATE_NAME_LEN);
>> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].flags = 0;
>
> No target_residency specified ?
>
target_residency and latency are already specified in the existing code
outside this if-else block. There is no change in interpreting those nodes.
>> +
>> + powernv_states[nr_idle_states].enter = &stop_loop;
>
> s/&stop_loop/stop_loop/
I'll make the change.
Thanks a lot for the review.
-Shreyas
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states
[not found] ` <201605311351.u4VDn1i7019941@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com>
@ 2016-06-01 3:12 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2016-06-01 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shreyas B Prabhu, Daniel Lezcano
Cc: linuxppc-dev, paulus, linux-kernel, mikey, ego, maddy,
Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, Rob Herring, Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 19:20 +0530, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote:
> On 05/30/2016 07:56 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 05/24/2016 03:15 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> > > + psscr_val = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_val),
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + rc = of_property_read_u64_array(power_mgt,
> > > + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-psscr", psscr_val, dt_idle_states);
> >
> > [cc'ed Lorenzo and Rob ]
> >
> > I don't see the documentation for the binding. Wouldn't make sense to
> > add the value per idle state instead of an index based array ?
The binding *should* be documented here AFAIK:
https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/blob/master/doc/device-tree/ibm%2Copal/power-mgt.txt
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-01 3:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-24 13:15 [PATCH v4 00/10] powerpc/powernv/cpuidle: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-05-24 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] cpuidle/powernv: " Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-05-30 14:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-05-31 13:50 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
[not found] ` <201605311351.u4VDn1i7019941@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com>
2016-06-01 3:12 ` Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).