From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Trace: PM: promote event 'power_domain_target' to generic power domains. Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:49:11 +0200 Message-ID: <5770595.eudVgXqToR@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1443429864-4177-2-git-send-email-mtitinger+renesas@baylibre.com> <1842060.xHgP7up4AJ@vostro.rjw.lan> <561E0FD3.6010809@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:49535 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932472AbbJNQUa (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:20:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <561E0FD3.6010809@baylibre.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Marc Titinger Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Marc Titinger , ahaslam@baylibre.com On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:18:27 AM Marc Titinger wrote: > On 14/10/2015 02:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, September 28, 2015 03:20:44 PM Marc Titinger wrote: > >> - change arg3 to a state name string: we got the current CPU rom the trace > >> backend already. This also prepares for multiple/named states in the power > >> domain, consistent with idle-states. states in the domain may match given > >> CPU states in this case, we will trace them by their name, and potentially > >> use arg2 as a link to their index for the cpuidle driver. > >> > >> - tested with Juno DP > >> > >> -0 [000] 42.395510: power_domain_target: a53_pd index=0 'cluster-sleep-0' > >> -0 [000] 42.395528: cpu_idle: state=4294967295 cpu_id=0 > >> -0 [000] 42.395668: cpu_idle: state=2 cpu_id=0 > >> > >> - compiled for Omap2+ > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc Titinger > > > > Hi, > > > > What's your intent regarding this series? Do you want it to be applied > > separately, or is it going to be part of a larger series? > > Hi Rafael, > > v3 is a missed attempt to rebase this on the current head, but I did not > fix v3 because thinking twice it's not that useful until Axel Haslam's > multiple genpd states stuff is merged in. I'm finding v2 useful, shall I > re-post v2 as v4 for clarity then ? That's up to you mostly. If I get ACKs from all of the appropriate people on those, I can easily apply them. Thanks, Rafael