From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:04:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57D750BA.6010305@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFra5YRUPB7a2th6K1hnK=PUz9k27d6DNNoVaJ76QSWe3w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc Rafael.
On 09/01/2016 05:26 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In general I think the change makes sense, although it's this last
> piece here that I wonder about.
>
> Is it okay that we expose sysfs attributes to userspace that don't
> have any effect if they change the values? Perhaps it should be the
> responsibility of the menu governor somehow to expose the sysfs nodes
> instead? Unless there are some difficulties that prevents us from that
> of course.
>
Hi Ulf,
Sorry for response so late. The pm QoS designed to expose this interface
in userspace. Root user can change this value and made effect on device
sleeping status. That's required.
Since this is per device interface, set it on menu governor isn't so good.
Regards
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-13 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 8:42 [PATCH 1/4] cpu: clean up register_cpu func Alex Shi
2016-08-25 8:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu Alex Shi
2016-08-31 10:45 ` Alex Shi
2016-08-31 13:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-09-01 3:39 ` Alex Shi
2016-09-01 3:45 ` Alex Shi
2016-09-01 3:50 ` Alex Shi
2016-09-01 9:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-13 1:04 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2016-09-13 7:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-13 13:57 ` Alex Shi
2016-08-25 8:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle/menu: stop seeking deeper idle if current state is too deep Alex Shi
2016-08-31 10:45 ` Alex Shi
2016-09-13 14:01 ` Alex Shi
2016-08-25 8:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Alex Shi
2016-08-31 10:46 ` Alex Shi
2016-09-13 14:02 ` Alex Shi
2016-09-13 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-14 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-23 1:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-23 4:58 ` Alex Shi
2016-08-31 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpu: clean up register_cpu func Alex Shi
2016-08-31 13:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57D750BA.6010305@linaro.org \
--to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).