From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:16:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59652423.8000806@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170707101704.qncj373s3eliit2y@e106622-lin>
On 07/07/2017 03:17 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 06/07/17 21:43, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Patrick Bellasi
>> <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> @@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>>>
>>> sg_cpu->util = util;
>>> sg_cpu->max = max;
>>> +
>>> + /* CPU is entering IDLE, reset flags without triggering an update */
>>> + if (unlikely(flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE)) {
>>> + sg_cpu->flags = 0;
>>> + goto done;
>>> + }
>>
>> Instead of defining a new flag for idle, wouldn't another way be to
>> just clear the flag from the RT scheduling class with an extra call to
>> cpufreq_update_util with flags = 0 during dequeue_rt_entity? That
>> seems to me to be also the right place to clear the flag since the
>> flag is set in the corresponding class to begin with.
>>
>
> Make sense to me too. Also considering that for DL (with my patches) we
> don't generally want to clear the flag at dequeue time, but only when
> the 0-lag timer fires.
>
Makes sense to me too.
-Saravana
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-04 17:34 [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-05 5:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-05 11:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 4:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-06 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-07-11 19:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-05 4:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-05 13:04 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 5:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-07 4:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-07 10:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-07-11 19:16 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-05 6:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-05 13:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 5:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-07 5:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-07 5:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-07 6:44 ` Vikram Mulukutla
2017-07-08 6:14 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-10 17:49 ` Vikram Mulukutla
2017-07-11 5:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-04 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-07-06 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59652423.8000806@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=andresoportus@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).