From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
smuckle.linux@gmail.com, juri.lelli@arm.com,
Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
eas-dev@lists.linaro.org, joelaf@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] cpufreq: Process remote callbacks from any CPU if the platform permits
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:20:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <597F9F12.4000304@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c121a20eff05565155852c070e83504bf117da3e.1501223897.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 07/27/2017 11:46 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On many platforms, CPUs can do DVFS across cpufreq policies. i.e CPU
> from policy-A can change frequency of CPUs belonging to policy-B.
>
> This is quite common in case of ARM platforms where we don't
> configure any per-cpu register.
>
> Add a flag to identify such platforms and update
> cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs() to allow remote callbacks if this flag is
> set.
>
> Also enable the flag for cpufreq-dt driver which is used only on ARM
> platforms currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 1 +
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> index fef3c2160691..d83ab94d041a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
>
> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
> + policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true;
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index b3b6e8203e82..227cd0f13300 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,15 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> */
> unsigned int transition_delay_us;
>
> + /*
> + * Remote DVFS flag (Not added to the driver structure as we don't want
> + * to access another structure from scheduler hotpath).
> + *
> + * Should be set if CPUs can do DVFS on behalf of other CPUs from
> + * different cpufreq policies.
> + */
> + bool dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu;
> +
Seems reasonable. This is something that can be easily set by the driver.
> /* Cached frequency lookup from cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq. */
> unsigned int cached_target_freq;
> int cached_resolved_idx;
> @@ -564,8 +573,13 @@ struct governor_attr {
>
> static inline bool cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> - /* Allow remote callbacks only on the CPUs sharing cpufreq policy */
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus))
> + /*
> + * Allow remote callbacks if:
> + * - dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu flag is set
> + * - the local and remote CPUs share cpufreq policy
> + */
> + if (policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu ||
> + cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus))
> return true;
>
> return false;
>
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-28 6:46 [PATCH V5 0/2] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar
2017-07-28 6:46 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar
2017-07-31 21:19 ` Saravana Kannan
2017-07-28 6:46 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] cpufreq: Process remote callbacks from any CPU if the platform permits Viresh Kumar
2017-07-29 3:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-07-31 4:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-31 21:20 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2017-08-01 11:00 ` [Eas-dev] " Pavan Kondeti
2017-08-02 3:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-01 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 0/2] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 23:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=597F9F12.4000304@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=eas-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=smuckle.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).