From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Prakash, Prashanth" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_stats in the absence of frequency table Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:41:24 -0600 Message-ID: <5a559b20-28f5-5b51-6b8e-11d7884709ab@codeaurora.org> References: <1470179937-14698-1-git-send-email-pprakash@codeaurora.org> <1547887.jMFZtBx5tV@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57772 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754338AbcHBXwN (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:52:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1547887.jMFZtBx5tV@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, alexey.klimov@arm.com, hotran@apm.com, cov@codeaurora.org Hi Rafael, On 8/2/2016 5:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, August 02, 2016 05:18:57 PM Prashanth Prakash wrote: >> cpufreq drivers such as CPPC works on contigious scale and does >> not have a static frequency table. This commit adds cpufreq_stats >> support for such drivers by creating a pseudo frequency table by >> discretizing the contigious scale. > No. > > And why? The motivation is to be able to collect the frequency distribution data via time_in_state sysfs entry as we can collect for other cpufreq drivers that uses a frequency table. Thanks, Prashanth