linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>,
	Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:44:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cb81f3b-45a0-d566-3d63-569b5706e9fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230621143602.GI2053369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 6/21/23 10:36, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:59:52AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 6/21/23 03:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:06:22AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> Commit bf5835bcdb96 ("intel_idle: Disable IBRS during long idle")
>>>> disables IBRS when the CPU enters long idle. However, when a CPU becomes
>>>> offline, the IBRS bit is still set when X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS is
>>>> enabled. That will impact the performance of a sibling CPU. Mitigate
>>>> this performance impact by clearing all the mitigation bits in SPEC_CTRL
>>>> MSR when offline and restoring the value of the MSR when it becomes
>>>> online again.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>>>> index 352f0ce1ece4..5ff82fef413c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>>>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
>>>>    #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>>>    #include <asm/stackprotector.h>
>>>>    #include <asm/sev.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
>>>>    /* representing HT siblings of each logical CPU */
>>>>    DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
>>>> @@ -1838,12 +1839,24 @@ void __noreturn hlt_play_dead(void)
>>>>    void native_play_dead(void)
>>>>    {
>>>> +	u64 spec_ctrl = spec_ctrl_current();
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS)) {
>>>> +		this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, 0);
>>>> +		native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0);
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>>    	play_dead_common();
>>>>    	tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
>>>>    	mwait_play_dead();
>>>>    	if (cpuidle_play_dead())
>>>>    		hlt_play_dead();
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS)) {
>>>> +		native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, spec_ctrl);
>>>> +		this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, spec_ctrl);
>>>> +	}
>>>>    }
>>> play_dead() is marked __noreturn
>> There are different versions of play_dead() in the kernel. Some of them are
>> indeed marked __noreturn like the non-SMP one in arch/x86/kernel/process.c.
>> The native_play_dead() that I am patching isn't one of those.
> mostly by accident I think, hlt_play_dead() is, so I'm thinking
> everybody (all compiler and objtool) managed to figure out
> native_play_dead() is __noreturn too.

Well, hlt_play_dead() is only called if cpuidle_play_dead() returns an 
error which is not the typical case. My testing does confirm that this 
patch is able to keep the IBRS bit off when a CPU is offline via its 
online sysfs file.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-21 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-20 14:06 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/speculation: Disable IBRS when idle Waiman Long
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/speculation: Provide a debugfs file to dump SPEC_CTRL MSRs Waiman Long
2023-06-21  7:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21  8:24     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-06-21 14:02       ` Waiman Long
2023-06-21 13:47     ` Waiman Long
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline Waiman Long
2023-06-21  7:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 13:59     ` Waiman Long
2023-06-21 14:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 14:44         ` Waiman Long [this message]
2023-06-21 14:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 14:51             ` Waiman Long
2023-06-21 14:54               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 15:42                 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_idle: Sync up the SPEC_CTRL MSR value to x86_spec_ctrl_current Waiman Long
2023-06-21  7:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] intel_idle: Add no_ibrs module parameter to force disable IBRS Waiman Long
2023-06-21  7:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/idle: Disable IBRS entering mwait idle and enable it on wakeup Waiman Long
2023-06-21  7:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 14:05     ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5cb81f3b-45a0-d566-3d63-569b5706e9fe@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).