linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:26:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <610b63b7594e5cd364c498f60e69b9e174db9257.1387554926.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)

There are cases where cpufreq_add_dev() may fail for some CPUs during resume.
With the current code we will still have sysfs cpufreq files for such CPUs, and
struct cpufreq_policy would be already freed for them. Hence any operation on
those sysfs files would result in kernel warnings.

To fix this, lets remove those sysfs files or put the associated kobject in case
of such errors. Also, to make it simple lets remove the sysfs links from all the
CPUs (except policy->cpu) during suspend as that operation wouldn't result with a
loss of sysfs file permissions. And so we will create those links during resume
as well.

Reported-and-tested-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 02d534d..fab042e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -845,8 +845,7 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-				  unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev,
-				  bool frozen)
+				  unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -877,11 +876,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Don't touch sysfs links during light-weight init */
-	if (!frozen)
-		ret = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq");
-
-	return ret;
+	return sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq");
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -926,6 +921,27 @@ err_free_policy:
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static void cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	struct kobject *kobj;
+	struct completion *cmp;
+
+	down_read(&policy->rwsem);
+	kobj = &policy->kobj;
+	cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
+	up_read(&policy->rwsem);
+	kobject_put(kobj);
+
+	/*
+	 * We need to make sure that the underlying kobj is
+	 * actually not referenced anymore by anybody before we
+	 * proceed with unloading.
+	 */
+	pr_debug("waiting for dropping of refcount\n");
+	wait_for_completion(cmp);
+	pr_debug("wait complete\n");
+}
+
 static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
@@ -986,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
 	list_for_each_entry(tpolicy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) {
 			read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
-			ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev, frozen);
+			ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev);
 			up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
 			return ret;
 		}
@@ -1096,7 +1112,10 @@ err_get_freq:
 	if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
 		cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
 err_set_policy_cpu:
+	if (frozen)
+		cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
 	cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
+
 nomem_out:
 	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
 
@@ -1118,7 +1137,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 }
 
 static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-					   unsigned int old_cpu, bool frozen)
+					   unsigned int old_cpu)
 {
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1126,10 +1145,6 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	/* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
 	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu));
 
-	/* Don't touch sysfs files during light-weight tear-down */
-	if (frozen)
-		return cpu_dev->id;
-
 	sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
 	ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -1196,7 +1211,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
 		if (!frozen)
 			sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
 	} else if (cpus > 1) {
-		new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, frozen);
+		new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
 		if (new_cpu >= 0) {
 			update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu);
 
@@ -1218,8 +1233,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 	int ret;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	struct kobject *kobj;
-	struct completion *cmp;
 
 	read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 	policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
@@ -1249,22 +1262,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!frozen) {
-			down_read(&policy->rwsem);
-			kobj = &policy->kobj;
-			cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
-			up_read(&policy->rwsem);
-			kobject_put(kobj);
-
-			/*
-			 * We need to make sure that the underlying kobj is
-			 * actually not referenced anymore by anybody before we
-			 * proceed with unloading.
-			 */
-			pr_debug("waiting for dropping of refcount\n");
-			wait_for_completion(cmp);
-			pr_debug("wait complete\n");
-		}
+		if (!frozen)
+			cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
 
 		/*
 		 * Perform the ->exit() even during light-weight tear-down,
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e


             reply	other threads:[~2013-12-20 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-20 15:56 Viresh Kumar [this message]
2013-12-22  1:00 ` [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-23  5:55   ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  6:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23  6:55       ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  7:55         ` viresh kumar
2013-12-23  9:23           ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 10:45             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 10:57               ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 11:13                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 11:42                   ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 15:45                     ` viresh kumar
2013-12-24  0:35                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-24  0:27                         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-24  0:43                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=610b63b7594e5cd364c498f60e69b9e174db9257.1387554926.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).