From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq-dt's platform data
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:44:12 +0200
Message-ID: <6184285.1YvjMQ4hCe@wuerfel>
References: <cover.1461228504.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:51085 "EHLO
	mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752546AbcDVWoe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:44:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <cover.1461228504.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
To: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, nm@ti.com, andrew@lunn.ch, jason@lakedaemon.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com

On Thursday 21 April 2016 14:28:52 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @Arnd: Can you please look at patches 7-10 ..

Looks good to me overall once you address Stephen's comments (I would have
said the same things on patches 7 and 8.

I also have a suggestion for improving patch 10.

	Arnd