Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PM: EM: Add min/max available performance state limits
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:01:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61afac10-b434-4e39-8c49-c220add4bd8e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cdb2f8b-62e0-455c-a3a5-ed5359a2e941@arm.com>



On 10/30/24 08:48, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 10/29/24 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:43 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote:
>>>

[snip]

>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_update_performance_limits);
>>
>> It would be good to have at least one caller of this function in the 
>> tree.
> 
> Yes, I know, but we had delays with the SCMI cpufreq to get the
> notifications support, which are sent from FW...
> 
> The patch using this API was part of v1 but with assumption that
> those SCMI notifications are merged.
> 
> The patch v1 for the SCMI cpufreq driver [1].
> 
> In that v1 cover letter I mentioned that the 2nd patch depends
> on notifications [2].
> 
> I will have to work with Cristian on that notification in SCMI
> then this API will be used. I can see that it stuck for a while
> in v5. Let me sort that out (probably not in this merge window
> though).

Just to link the effort which has been started into that direction:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ab36709d-a181-4621-a8e5-0ef38b80186b@arm.com/


> 
> Can we do it this way?
> 
> Regards,
> Lukasz
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403162315.1458337-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com/
> [2] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403162315.1458337-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/
> [3] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603192654.2167620-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-30 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29  9:43 [PATCH v2 0/1] Update Energy Model with performance limits Lukasz Luba
2024-10-29  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] PM: EM: Add min/max available performance state limits Lukasz Luba
2024-10-29 18:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-30  8:48     ` Lukasz Luba
2024-10-30 10:01       ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2024-10-30 11:23         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-30 11:34           ` Lukasz Luba
2024-10-30 11:41             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-30 11:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-30 11:50     ` Lukasz Luba
2024-10-30 13:18       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61afac10-b434-4e39-8c49-c220add4bd8e@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox