From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Samuel Zhang <guoqzhan@amd.com>,
"Zhang, GuoQing (Sam)" <GuoQing.Zhang@amd.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"len.brown@intel.com" <len.brown@intel.com>,
"pavel@kernel.org" <pavel@kernel.org>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>,
"Lazar, Lijo" <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
Cc: "Zhao, Victor" <Victor.Zhao@amd.com>,
"Chang, HaiJun" <HaiJun.Chang@amd.com>,
"Ma, Qing (Mark)" <Qing.Ma@amd.com>,
"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: move GTT to SHM after eviction for hibernation
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:48:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62ff22f5-f10d-4b32-aa04-eabb21935fdf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558ad3d6-7349-40f1-ba06-0fa46701b247@amd.com>
On 02.07.25 09:28, Samuel Zhang wrote:
>
> On 2025/7/1 16:22, Christian König wrote:
>> On 01.07.25 10:18, Zhang, GuoQing (Sam) wrote:
>>> [AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for the feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>> For “return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;”, it is equivalent to “return ret;” since ret is always <= 0 after the loop.
>> No it isn't.
>>
>> ttm_global_swapout() returns the number of pages swapped out and only a negative error code if something went wrong.
>
>
> /**
> * move GTT BOs to shmem for hibernation.
> *
> * returns 0 on success, negative on failure.
> */
> int ttm_device_prepare_hibernation(void)
> {
> struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
> .interruptible = false,
> .no_wait_gpu = false,
> .force_alloc = true
> };
> int ret;
>
> do {
> ret = ttm_global_swapout(&ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
> } while (ret > 0);
> return ret;
> }
>
> This is the new code version.
> If ttm_global_swapout() return positive number, the while loop will continue to the next iteration.
> The while loop stops only when ttm_global_swapout() returns 0 or negative number. In both case, the new function can just return the ret.
Ok, now I at least got what you wanted to do. But that is not really what I had in mind and isn't really good coding style.
Please use ttm_device_swapout() instead of ttm_global_swapout(), apart from that we can probably keep it that way.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> The ret values printed in the do while loop:
> [ 53.745892] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 512
> [ 53.950975] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 35840
> [ 53.951713] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 9
> [ 67.712196] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 2187264
> [ 67.713726] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 512
> [ 67.759212] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 32768
> [ 67.761946] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1024
> [ 67.762685] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 85
> [ 67.763518] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 175
> [ 67.767318] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 2367
> [ 67.767942] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1
> [ 67.768499] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1
> [ 67.769054] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1
> ...
> [ 67.783554] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1
> [ 67.785755] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1
> [ 67.788607] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 1
> [ 67.789906] [TTM DEVICE] ttm_device_prepare_hibernation:164 ret 0
>
>
> Regards
> Sam
>
>
>
>>
>> And it's probably not a good idea to return that from the new function.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> For all other comments, I will revise the patch accordingly in v2.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
>>> *Date: *Monday, June 30, 2025 at 19:54
>>> *To: *Zhang, GuoQing (Sam) <GuoQing.Zhang@amd.com>, rafael@kernel.org <rafael@kernel.org>, len.brown@intel.com <len.brown@intel.com>, pavel@kernel.org <pavel@kernel.org>, Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>, Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>, Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
>>> *Cc: *Zhao, Victor <Victor.Zhao@amd.com>, Chang, HaiJun <HaiJun.Chang@amd.com>, Ma, Qing (Mark) <Qing.Ma@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: move GTT to SHM after eviction for hibernation
>>>
>>> On 30.06.25 12:41, Samuel Zhang wrote:
>>>> When hibernate with data center dGPUs, huge number of VRAM BOs evicted
>>>> to GTT and takes too much system memory. This will cause hibernation
>>>> fail due to insufficient memory for creating the hibernation image.
>>>>
>>>> Move GTT BOs to shmem in KMD, then shmem to swap disk in kernel
>>>> hibernation code to make room for hibernation image.
>>> This should probably be two patches, one for TTM and then an amdgpu patch to forward the event.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Zhang <guoqing.zhang@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h | 1 +
>>>> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>>> index 4d57269c9ca8..5aede907a591 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>>> @@ -2889,6 +2889,7 @@ int amdgpu_fill_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>>>> int amdgpu_ttm_evict_resources(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int mem_type)
>>>> {
>>>> struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
>>>> + int r;
>>>> switch (mem_type) {
>>>> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
>>>> @@ -2903,7 +2904,17 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_evict_resources(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int mem_type)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>> - return ttm_resource_manager_evict_all(&adev->mman.bdev, man);
>>>> + r = ttm_resource_manager_evict_all(&adev->mman.bdev, man);
>>>> + if (r) {
>>>> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to evict memory type %d\n", mem_type);
>>>> + return r;
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (adev->in_s4 && mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) {
>>>> + r = ttm_resource_manager_swapout();
>>>> + if (r)
>>>> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to swap out, %d\n", r);
>>>> + }
>>>> + return r;
>>>> }
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>>>> index fd41b56e2c66..07b1f5a5afc2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>>>> @@ -534,6 +534,24 @@ void ttm_resource_manager_init(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_manager_init);
>>>> +int ttm_resource_manager_swapout(void)
>>> This needs documentation, better placement and a better name.
>>>
>>> First of all put it into ttm_device.c instead of the resource manager.
>>>
>>> Then call it something like ttm_device_prepare_hibernation or similar.
>>>
>>>
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
>>>> + .interruptible = false,
>>>> + .no_wait_gpu = false,
>>>> + .force_alloc = true
>>>> + };
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + while (true) {
>>> Make that:
>>>
>>> do {
>>> ret = ...
>>> } while (ret > 0);
>>>
>>>> + ret = ttm_global_swapout(&ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (ret <= 0)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + return ret;
>>> It's rather pointless to return the number of swapped out pages.
>>>
>>> Make that "return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_manager_swapout);
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * ttm_resource_manager_evict_all
>>>> *
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>>>> index b873be9597e2..46181758068e 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>>>> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ void ttm_resource_manager_init(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
>>>> int ttm_resource_manager_evict_all(struct ttm_device *bdev,
>>>> struct ttm_resource_manager *man);
>>>> +int ttm_resource_manager_swapout(void);
>>>> uint64_t ttm_resource_manager_usage(struct ttm_resource_manager *man);
>>>> void ttm_resource_manager_debug(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-30 10:41 [PATCH 0/3] reduce system memory requirement for hibernation Samuel Zhang
2025-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: move GTT to SHM after eviction " Samuel Zhang
2025-06-30 11:54 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <DM4PR12MB5937FFB3E121E489A261785DE541A@DM4PR12MB5937.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2025-07-01 8:22 ` Christian König
2025-07-02 7:28 ` Samuel Zhang
2025-07-02 7:48 ` Christian König [this message]
2025-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM: hibernate: shrink shmem pages after dev_pm_ops.prepare() Samuel Zhang
2025-06-30 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: skip kfd resume_process for dev_pm_ops.thaw() Samuel Zhang
2025-06-30 11:58 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <8eb1700d-4d60-4a1e-9d09-718f65baaf1e@amd.com>
2025-07-01 8:32 ` Christian König
2025-07-01 16:07 ` Alex Deucher
2025-07-02 7:23 ` Sam
2025-07-02 13:54 ` Alex Deucher
2025-07-02 14:07 ` Lazar, Lijo
2025-07-04 10:24 ` Zhang, GuoQing (Sam)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62ff22f5-f10d-4b32-aa04-eabb21935fdf@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=GuoQing.Zhang@amd.com \
--cc=HaiJun.Chang@amd.com \
--cc=Lijo.Lazar@amd.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Qing.Ma@amd.com \
--cc=Victor.Zhao@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=guoqzhan@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox