From: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:51:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <631ffd68-7aab-2483-8799-2019bf3bb444@partner.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPc1rOyFujyWk4HwmQb6YEXd=CEHKwN8AH_pKxk-6CA08w@mail.gmail.com>
On 10.07.2019 12:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 12:03, Kamil Konieczny
> <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10.07.2019 11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 16:12, <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for
>>>> Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm
>>>> and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using
>>>> regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be
>>>> used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is
>>>> already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this,
>>>> move setting regulators into opp/core.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3.
>>>>
>>>> The last patch depends on two previous.
>>>
>>> So you break the ABI... I assume that patchset maintains
>>> bisectability. However there is no explanation why ABI break is needed
>>> so this does not look good...
>>
>> Patchset is bisectable, first one is simple and do not depends on others,
>> second depends on first, last depends on first and second.
>>
>> What do you mean by breaking ABI ?
>
> I mean, that Linux kernel stops working with existing DTBs... or am I
> mistaken and there is no problem? Maybe I confused the order...
It is not ABI break, it should work with existing DTBs
--
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-10 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190708141158eucas1p17d4b50978dbe1e5c876ce6d8f433cc95@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800 k.konieczny
2019-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] opp: core: add regulators enable and disable k.konieczny
2019-07-09 5:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-10 10:16 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 10:42 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 10:43 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 13:52 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 17:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-11 6:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-11 12:58 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate() k.konieczny
2019-07-10 17:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-11 13:36 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800 k.konieczny
2019-07-10 9:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-10 9:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] add " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-10 10:03 ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 10:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-10 13:51 ` Kamil Konieczny [this message]
2019-07-10 17:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=631ffd68-7aab-2483-8799-2019bf3bb444@partner.samsung.com \
--to=k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox