public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@quicinc.com>,
	agross@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, quic_subbaram@quicinc.com,
	quic_collinsd@quicinc.com, quic_kamalw@quicinc.com,
	quic_jestar@quicinc.com, marijn.suijten@somainline.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] iio: adc: Update bindings to remove support for ADC7 name used on QCOM PMICs
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:33:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64299e61-c519-4318-a10d-87df91c496a5@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcbab235-3510-9e8e-5f08-7b8241a71688@quicinc.com>

On 23/10/2023 08:11, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 7/9/2023 10:49 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/07/2023 09:28, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>>> Now that usage of "ADC7" name has been replaced with usage of "ADC5
>>> Gen2" name everywhere, remove all support for "ADC7" name.
>> Why?
> 
> The idea is to replace usage of the name "ADC7" with "ADC5 Gen2" 
> everywhere possible, to match our internal convention and align better 

That's not a valid reason to touch bindings. Compatible is just some
unique name, so there is nothing bad in existing name.

> with the "ADC5 Gen3" support I'm adding in this patch series - is it 
> better if I just update documentation and dtbindings directly in one 
> patch for ADC5 Gen2 and update devicetree in one patch after that for 
> the corresponding macro changes?

Don't touch the compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-23  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230708072835.3035398-1-quic_jprakash@quicinc.com>
2023-07-08  7:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] iio: adc: Update bindings for ADC7 name used on QCOM PMICs Jishnu Prakash
2023-07-08 14:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-23  6:05     ` Jishnu Prakash
2023-10-23  9:56       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-07-09 17:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-23  6:08     ` Jishnu Prakash
2023-07-08  7:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] iio: adc: Update bindings to remove support " Jishnu Prakash
2023-07-08 15:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-23  6:10     ` Jishnu Prakash
2023-07-09 17:19   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-23  6:11     ` Jishnu Prakash
2023-10-23  6:33       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-07-08  7:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Copy QCOM ADC bindings files Jishnu Prakash
2023-07-09 17:25   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-23  6:16     ` Jishnu Prakash
2023-10-23  6:19       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64299e61-c519-4318-a10d-87df91c496a5@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=amitk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@z3ntu.xyz \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_jestar@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_jprakash@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_kamalw@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox