From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
	by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A246D52;
	Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA9EFEC;
	Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.57.2.14] (unknown [10.57.2.14])
	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC39C3F7A6;
	Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <64d598b7-cff3-4036-8b6b-dea3083dd716@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:07:08 +0000
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-pm.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-pm+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-pm+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] thermal: exynos: use BIT wherever possible
Content-Language: en-US
To: m.majewski2@samsung.com
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
 "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
 "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
 ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
References: <96565d08-8d6b-4a37-8a83-90bdd53ba89a@arm.com>
 <20231120145049.310509-1-m.majewski2@samsung.com>
 <20231120145049.310509-9-m.majewski2@samsung.com>
 <CGME20231120145107eucas1p13ed9ea8772346c404d2d7f47d4c80f5a@eucms1p4>
 <20231121125400eucms1p40c19eedff56881e1a1a9f1560ac9a2d9@eucms1p4>
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231121125400eucms1p40c19eedff56881e1a1a9f1560ac9a2d9@eucms1p4>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



On 11/21/23 12:54, Mateusz Majewski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>>> @@ -590,15 +590,15 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_control(struct platform_device *pdev, bool on)
>>>                                     continue;
>>>     
>>>                             interrupt_en |=
>>> -                                (1 << (EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i));
>>> +                                BIT(EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i);
>>>                     }
>>>     
>>>                     interrupt_en |=
>>>                             interrupt_en << EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT;
>>>     
>>> -                con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
>>> +                con |= BIT(EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
>>>             } else
>>
>> Minor issue: the if-else segment here. When the 'if' has the
>> brackets, then the 'else' should have them as well,
>> even if there is only a single line under 'else'.
>> It's not strictly to this patch, but you can address that
>> later somewhere (just saw it here).
> 
> For what it's worth, this issue disappears after the final patch of this series,
> because the other branch reduces to a single line too (all the interrupt_en
> operations are done in the tmu_set_*_temp functions).

That sounds perfect.

I'm planning to build&run the patch set today evening, so I will finish
the review of the patch 9/9.