From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:27:37 +0100 Message-ID: <6591581.ooCMyGoxxx@wuerfel> References: <1424771762-16343-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150304200040.GA12126@leverpostej> <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:57514 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752662AbbCDWax (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:30:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Mark Rutland , Boris Brezillon , Jason Cooper , Linux PM list , Peter Zijlstra , Nicolas Ferre , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by > ^ an > > > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling > > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English > or we don't care ? I believe most developers use Incorrect English, the second most common is American English, followed by Indian English and British English. ;-) More seriously, just try to be consistent within one file or subsystem. Arnd