From: ally heev <allyheev@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
David Hunter <david.hunter.linux@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] checkpatch: add uninitialized pointer with __free attribute check
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:07:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66575ceb29493f3b9c5b8bb94f4f66bf21d53211.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <026a32413b0c9e4edb5d3ab411d18134078430d8.camel@perches.com>
On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 11:14 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 22:59 +0530, Ally Heev wrote:
> > uninitialized pointers with __free attribute can cause undefined
> > behaviour as the memory allocated to the pointer is freed
> > automatically when the pointer goes out of scope.
> > add check in checkpatch to detect such issues
> >
> > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8a4c0b43-cf63-400d-b33d-d9c447b7e0b9@suswa.mountain/
> > Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ally Heev <allyheev@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 5 +++++
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> > index d5c47e560324fb2399a5b1bc99c891ed1de10535..1a304bf38bcd27e50bbb7cd4383b07ac54d20b0a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> > @@ -1009,6 +1009,11 @@ Functions and Variables
> >
> > return bar;
> >
> > + **UNINITIALIZED_PTR_WITH_FREE**
> > + Pointers with __free attribute should be initialized. Not doing so
> > + may lead to undefined behavior as the memory allocated (garbage,
> > + in case not initialized) to the pointer is freed automatically
> > + when the pointer goes out of scope.
> >
> > Permissions
> > -----------
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index 92669904eecc7a8d2afd3f2625528e02b6d17cd6..1009a4a065e910143dabeee6640b3b3a4bd3fe06 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ our $InitAttributeData = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:initdata\b)};
> > our $InitAttributeConst = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:initconst\b)};
> > our $InitAttributeInit = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:init\b)};
> > our $InitAttribute = qr{$InitAttributeData|$InitAttributeConst|$InitAttributeInit};
> > +our $FreeAttribute = qr{__free\s*\(\s*$Ident\s*\)};
>
> If you are really suggesting using this, and I don't think it's
> particularly useful, please use
>
> out $InitAttributeFree = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:free\s*\(\s*$Ident\s*\)};
Thanks, I'll check it out
> >
> > # Notes to $Attribute:
> > # We need \b after 'init' otherwise 'initconst' will cause a false positive in a check
> > @@ -7721,6 +7722,12 @@ sub process {
> > ERROR("MISSING_SENTINEL", "missing sentinel in ID array\n" . "$here\n$stat\n");
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > +# check for uninitialized pointers with __free attribute
> > + while ($line =~ /\*\s*($Ident)\s+$FreeAttribute\s*[,;]/g) {
> > + ERROR("UNINITIALIZED_PTR_WITH_FREE",
> > + "pointer '$1' with __free attribute should be initialized\n" . $herecurr);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > # If we have no input at all, then there is nothing to report on
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-25 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 17:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] checkpatch: add checks incorrectly initialized pointers with __free attr Ally Heev
2025-10-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] checkpatch: add uninitialized pointer with __free attribute check Ally Heev
2025-10-24 18:14 ` Joe Perches
2025-10-25 3:37 ` ally heev [this message]
2025-10-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] add check for pointers with __free attribute initialized to NULL Ally Heev
2025-10-24 18:01 ` Joe Perches
2025-10-24 18:14 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-24 18:23 ` Joe Perches
2025-10-24 18:37 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-25 6:17 ` ally heev
2025-10-24 18:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-25 6:23 ` ally heev
2025-10-27 5:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-27 8:34 ` ally heev
2025-10-25 6:29 ` ally heev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66575ceb29493f3b9c5b8bb94f4f66bf21d53211.camel@gmail.com \
--to=allyheev@gmail.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).