linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:32:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66980e2b51a83bf34f6fd18ee55155b6c667aa6a.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Currently update_sampling_rate() runs over each online CPU and
cancels/queues work on it. Its very inefficient for the case where a
single policy manages multiple CPUs, as they can be processed together.

Also drop the unnecessary cancel_delayed_work_sync() as we are doing a
mod_delayed_work_on() in gov_queue_work(), which will take care of
pending works for us.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 841e1fa96ee7..cfecd3b67cb3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -247,40 +247,48 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
 		unsigned int new_rate)
 {
 	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+	struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
+	unsigned long next_sampling, appointed_at;
+	struct cpumask cpumask;
 	int cpu;
 
+	cpumask_copy(&cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
 	od_tuners->sampling_rate = new_rate = max(new_rate,
 			dbs_data->min_sampling_rate);
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-		struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
-		unsigned long next_sampling, appointed_at;
-
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpumask) {
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		if (!policy)
 			continue;
+
+		/* clear all CPUs of this policy */
+		cpumask_andnot(&cpumask, &cpumask, policy->cpus);
+
 		if (policy->governor != &cpufreq_gov_ondemand) {
 			cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 			continue;
 		}
+
 		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
 		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 
+		/*
+		 * Checking this for any CPU of the policy is fine. As either
+		 * all would have queued work or none.
+		 */
 		if (!delayed_work_pending(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork))
 			continue;
 
 		next_sampling = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate);
 		appointed_at = dbs_info->cdbs.dwork.timer.expires;
 
-		if (time_before(next_sampling, appointed_at)) {
-			cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork);
-
-			gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy,
-				       usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate),
-				       cpumask_of(cpu));
+		if (!time_before(next_sampling, appointed_at))
+			continue;
 
-		}
+		gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate),
+			       policy->cpus);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.4.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-22  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-22  8:02 [PATCH 00/10] cpufreq: governor: Further cleanups (v4.3) Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Use __func__ to print function's name Viresh Kumar
2015-06-23 15:39   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: conservative: Avoid races with transition notifier Viresh Kumar
2015-06-23 15:53   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-24  1:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-25  7:59       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26  5:57   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26  6:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: ondemand: only queue canceled works from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26  6:50   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26  7:28     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26  7:03   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26  7:32     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26  7:20   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-22  8:02 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-26  8:28   ` [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26  8:52     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: ondemand: update sampling rate immidiately Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: governor: Quit work-handlers early if governor is stopped Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22  8:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: Get rid of ->governor_enabled and its lock Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66980e2b51a83bf34f6fd18ee55155b6c667aa6a.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).