From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Eduardo Valentin
<edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: tegra: delete unneeded of_node_put
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:47:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66e7906c-9472-4fcb-7c04-750bb27d3989@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500108152-1812-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
On 15/07/17 09:42, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Device node iterators perform an of_node_put on each iteration, so putting
> an of_node_put before a continue results in a double put.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression e1;
> local idexpression child;
> iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> @@
>
> for_each_child_of_node(e1,child) {
> ... when != of_node_get(child)
> * of_node_put(child);
> ...
> * continue;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Furthermore, the call to thermal_of_cooling_device_register immediately
> calls __thermal_cooling_device_register with the same arguments. The
> latter function stores the device node argument, which is the second
> argument of for_each_child_of_node, in the returned thermal_cooling_device
> structure. This returned structure is then stored in the cdev field of
> stc. Thus it seems that the second argument of for_each_child_of_node
> escapes the scope of the for_each_child_of_node, so an explicit of_node_get
> on success of thermal_of_cooling_device_register is also needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> index 7d2db23..10f4fdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> @@ -1014,7 +1014,6 @@ static void soctherm_init_hw_throt_cdev(struct platform_device *pdev)
> tcd = thermal_of_cooling_device_register(np_stcc,
> (char *)name, ts,
> &throt_cooling_ops);
> - of_node_put(np_stcc);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tcd)) {
> dev_err(dev,
> "throttle-cfg: %s: failed to register cooling device\n",
> @@ -1022,6 +1021,7 @@ static void soctherm_init_hw_throt_cdev(struct platform_device *pdev)
> continue;
> }
>
> + of_node_get(np_stcc);
> stc->cdev = tcd;
> stc->init = true;
> }
Thanks for fixing this. However, I am wondering if it is better for the
'of_node_get' to be placed within the
thermal_of_cooling_device_register() function as it seems a bit odd if
the caller needs to know that this is being stored for later use.
Also, taking a quick look, I see a couple other drivers calling
thermal_of_cooling_device_register() and they are also not calling
of_node_get on success. So it maybe easier to fix placing it in the
thermal_of_cooling_device_register() function.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-15 8:42 [PATCH] thermal: tegra: delete unneeded of_node_put Julia Lawall
[not found] ` <1500108152-1812-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-17 13:47 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
[not found] ` <66e7906c-9472-4fcb-7c04-750bb27d3989-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-17 14:42 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-05 1:49 ` Eduardo Valentin
[not found] ` <20171205014918.GB3536-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-05 6:17 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66e7906c-9472-4fcb-7c04-750bb27d3989@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org \
--cc=edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox