Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Eduardo Valentin
	<edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: tegra: delete unneeded of_node_put
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:47:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66e7906c-9472-4fcb-7c04-750bb27d3989@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500108152-1812-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>


On 15/07/17 09:42, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Device node iterators perform an of_node_put on each iteration, so putting
> an of_node_put before a continue results in a double put.
> 
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression e1;
> local idexpression child;
> iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_child_of_node(e1,child) {
>    ... when != of_node_get(child)
> *  of_node_put(child);
>    ...
> *  continue;
> }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Furthermore, the call to thermal_of_cooling_device_register immediately
> calls __thermal_cooling_device_register with the same arguments.  The
> latter function stores the device node argument, which is the second
> argument of for_each_child_of_node, in the returned thermal_cooling_device
> structure.  This returned structure is then stored in the cdev field of
> stc.  Thus it seems that the second argument of for_each_child_of_node
> escapes the scope of the for_each_child_of_node, so an explicit of_node_get
> on success of thermal_of_cooling_device_register is also needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> index 7d2db23..10f4fdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> @@ -1014,7 +1014,6 @@ static void soctherm_init_hw_throt_cdev(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		tcd = thermal_of_cooling_device_register(np_stcc,
>  							 (char *)name, ts,
>  							 &throt_cooling_ops);
> -		of_node_put(np_stcc);
>  		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tcd)) {
>  			dev_err(dev,
>  				"throttle-cfg: %s: failed to register cooling device\n",
> @@ -1022,6 +1021,7 @@ static void soctherm_init_hw_throt_cdev(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		of_node_get(np_stcc);
>  		stc->cdev = tcd;
>  		stc->init = true;
>  	}

Thanks for fixing this. However, I am wondering if it is better for the
'of_node_get' to be placed within the
thermal_of_cooling_device_register() function as it seems a bit odd if
the caller needs to know that this is being stored for later use.

Also, taking a quick look, I see a couple other drivers calling
thermal_of_cooling_device_register() and they are also not calling
of_node_get on success. So it maybe easier to fix placing it in the
thermal_of_cooling_device_register() function.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-17 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-15  8:42 [PATCH] thermal: tegra: delete unneeded of_node_put Julia Lawall
     [not found] ` <1500108152-1812-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-17 13:47   ` Jon Hunter [this message]
     [not found]     ` <66e7906c-9472-4fcb-7c04-750bb27d3989-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-17 14:42       ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-05  1:49         ` Eduardo Valentin
     [not found]           ` <20171205014918.GB3536-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-05  6:17             ` Julia Lawall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66e7906c-9472-4fcb-7c04-750bb27d3989@nvidia.com \
    --to=jonathanh-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox