Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com,
	bsegall@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
	ionela.voinescu@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	bristot@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, ajones@ventanamicro.com, lftan@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] consolidate and cleanup CPU capacity
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:27:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <688adbc9-6dbc-4c98-971e-630525ff003b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009103621.374412-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>



On 10/9/23 11:36, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This is the 1st part of consolidating how the max compute capacity is
> used in the scheduler and how we calculate the frequency for a level of
> utilization.
> 
> Fix some unconsistancy when computing frequency for an utilization. There
> can be a mismatch between energy model and schedutil.
> 
> Next step will be to make a difference between the original
> max compute capacity of a CPU and what is currently available when
> there is a capping applying forever (i.e. seconds or more).
> 
> 

I have tested the patches apart from the last CPPC because the platform
didn't have that. The EAS is working OK, so feel free to add:

Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

apart from the patch 6/6 - with the cppc changes

Regards,
Lukasz

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-18 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09 10:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] consolidate and cleanup CPU capacity Vincent Guittot
2023-10-09 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: consolidate and cleanup access to CPU's max compute capacity Vincent Guittot
2023-10-09 11:01   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-09 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] topology: add a new arch_scale_freq_reference Vincent Guittot
2023-10-11 10:27   ` Pierre Gondois
2023-10-11 13:48     ` Vincent Guittot
2023-10-18 11:06   ` Lukasz Luba
2023-10-09 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] cpufreq: use the fixed and coherent frequency for scaling capacity Vincent Guittot
2023-10-09 11:01   ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-18 11:16   ` Lukasz Luba
2023-10-09 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] cpufreq/schedutil: use a fixed reference frequency Vincent Guittot
2023-10-18 11:21   ` Lukasz Luba
2023-10-09 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] energy_model: " Vincent Guittot
2023-10-18  9:16   ` Lukasz Luba
2023-10-09 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] cpufreq/cppc: set the frequency used for capacity computation Vincent Guittot
2023-10-11 10:27   ` Pierre Gondois
2023-10-11 14:25     ` Vincent Guittot
2023-10-16 12:12       ` Ionela Voinescu
2023-10-16 15:32         ` Vincent Guittot
2023-10-17  9:02           ` Ionela Voinescu
2023-10-17 13:41             ` Vincent Guittot
2023-10-18 11:27 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=688adbc9-6dbc-4c98-971e-630525ff003b@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=lftan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suagrfillet@gmail.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox