From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D770410E3; Thu, 29 May 2025 06:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.35 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748500149; cv=none; b=dKVnBlNsrFL1PKw30dmspzW1zr4lMsIOoHAR5xDurQ41TZwF9wXYe5kASClTjzPnV0JEjWcHxh7reav8/ARdhfQvlQ5KVclHFnHTNuWDqyIHD/1dOnPrJlzc9HiwkLQYfGvZYE7uOcBZ1kTNcTM+YNGFHxcbEfonv9qaRv1hD4Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748500149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nEZFeDhMbKm8P6aZ9Z6p0YQJ3z8YaMzgK9SpR1wNv50=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=BI7u2A50q/bRpptXZ1eDUIBfBWhbc5d1cVFq3/ESf9JQTjCgIVKwW17Sh2L23f3z9bQBVU4Pt9S4fcJ3url35gJeLokUAA4DFzcdWLe6a9x9wm2W1Pm3hxDAFNtnLT/Feb4evG/iusM0Xs/XOyBgCi1d9j0Ms0YbRt3R9XKLv04= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.35 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4b7GdQ3CC0z1f1pM; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:27:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemh100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.93]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C65D1A016C; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:28:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.121.90] (10.67.121.90) by kwepemh100008.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:28:56 +0800 Message-ID: <69327669-155d-415b-a218-2b4806a90890@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:28:56 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Some optimizations for cppc_cpufreq.c. To: Pierre Gondois , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , References: <20250526113057.3086513-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> <237e957e-82fa-41ea-9f6e-bd37f51003aa@arm.com> From: "zhenglifeng (A)" In-Reply-To: <237e957e-82fa-41ea-9f6e-bd37f51003aa@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemh100008.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.93) On 2025/5/28 21:26, Pierre Gondois wrote: > Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois Thanks! > > On 5/26/25 13:30, Lifeng Zheng wrote: >> This patch series makes some minor optimizations for cppc_cpufreq.c to >> makes codes cleaner. >> >> Lifeng Zheng (3): >>    cpufreq: CPPC: Remove cpu_data_list >>    cpufreq: CPPC: Return void in populate_efficiency_class() >>    cpufreq: CPPC: Remove forward declaration of >>      cppc_cpufreq_register_em() >> >>   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 59 +++++++++------------------------- >>   include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h       |  1 - >>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) >>