From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 Resend 07/16] cpufreq: stats: get rid of per-cpu cpufreq_stats_table
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:34:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a075d926f65e72bf9c099e50deca54899ea91c7.1421128708.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc91ff3fcc9db30f784bbc691a062982af8e0fe0.1420558386.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
All CPUs sharing a cpufreq policy share stats too. For this reason, add a stats
pointer to struct cpufreq_policy and drop per-CPU variable cpufreq_stats_table
used for accessing cpufreq stats so as to reduce code complexity.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
Resending only a single patch as found a issue with it while testing with my
newly written cpufreq-test suite. The problem was that we haven't done
cpufreq_cpu_put() for few failure cases and that restricts the cpufreq driver
module to unload.
Here is the diff to V3:
@@ -265,14 +265,14 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct cpufreq_stats *stats;
int old_index, new_index;
- if (val != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
- return 0;
-
if (!policy) {
pr_err("%s: No policy found\n", __func__);
return 0;
}
+ if (val != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
+ goto put_policy;
+
if (!policy->stats) {
pr_debug("%s: No stats found\n", __func__);
goto put_policy;
@@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct notifier_block *nb,
/* We can't do stats->time_in_state[-1]= .. */
if (old_index == -1 || new_index == -1)
- return 0;
+ goto put_policy;
if (old_index == new_index)
- return 0;
+ goto put_policy;
cpufreq_stats_update(stats);
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 6c234f548601..3792b2e2f4a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ struct cpufreq_stats {
#endif
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_stats *, cpufreq_stats_table);
-
static int cpufreq_stats_update(struct cpufreq_stats *stat)
{
unsigned long long cur_time = get_jiffies_64();
@@ -48,20 +46,15 @@ static int cpufreq_stats_update(struct cpufreq_stats *stat)
static ssize_t show_total_trans(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
{
- struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu);
- if (!stat)
- return 0;
- return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, stat->cpu)->total_trans);
+ return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", policy->stats->total_trans);
}
static ssize_t show_time_in_state(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
{
+ struct cpufreq_stats *stat = policy->stats;
ssize_t len = 0;
int i;
- struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu);
- if (!stat)
- return 0;
+
cpufreq_stats_update(stat);
for (i = 0; i < stat->state_num; i++) {
len += sprintf(buf + len, "%u %llu\n", stat->freq_table[i],
@@ -74,12 +67,10 @@ static ssize_t show_time_in_state(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
static ssize_t show_trans_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
{
+ struct cpufreq_stats *stat = policy->stats;
ssize_t len = 0;
int i, j;
- struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu);
- if (!stat)
- return 0;
cpufreq_stats_update(stat);
len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, " From : To\n");
len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, " : ");
@@ -145,8 +136,9 @@ static int freq_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_stats *stat, unsigned int freq)
static void __cpufreq_stats_free_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_stats *stat = policy->stats;
+ /* Already freed */
if (!stat)
return;
@@ -155,7 +147,7 @@ static void __cpufreq_stats_free_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &stats_attr_group);
kfree(stat->time_in_state);
kfree(stat);
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu) = NULL;
+ policy->stats = NULL;
}
static void cpufreq_stats_free_table(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -184,7 +176,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
/* stats already initialized */
- if (per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu))
+ if (policy->stats)
return -EEXIST;
stat = kzalloc(sizeof(*stat), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -196,7 +188,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
goto error_out;
stat->cpu = cpu;
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu) = stat;
+ policy->stats = stat;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table)
count++;
@@ -231,7 +223,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &stats_attr_group);
error_out:
kfree(stat);
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu) = NULL;
+ policy->stats = NULL;
return ret;
}
@@ -254,15 +246,7 @@ static void cpufreq_stats_create_table(unsigned int cpu)
static void cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table,
- policy->last_cpu);
-
- pr_debug("Updating stats_table for new_cpu %u from last_cpu %u\n",
- policy->cpu, policy->last_cpu);
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu) = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table,
- policy->last_cpu);
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->last_cpu) = NULL;
- stat->cpu = policy->cpu;
+ policy->stats->cpu = policy->cpu;
}
static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy(struct notifier_block *nb,
@@ -288,27 +272,36 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long val, void *data)
{
struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(freq->cpu);
struct cpufreq_stats *stat;
int old_index, new_index;
- if (val != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
+ if (!policy) {
+ pr_err("%s: No policy found\n", __func__);
return 0;
+ }
- stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, freq->cpu);
- if (!stat)
- return 0;
+ if (val != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
+ goto put_policy;
+
+ if (!policy->stats) {
+ pr_debug("%s: No stats found\n", __func__);
+ goto put_policy;
+ }
+
+ stat = policy->stats;
old_index = stat->last_index;
new_index = freq_table_get_index(stat, freq->new);
/* We can't do stat->time_in_state[-1]= .. */
if (old_index == -1 || new_index == -1)
- return 0;
+ goto put_policy;
cpufreq_stats_update(stat);
if (old_index == new_index)
- return 0;
+ goto put_policy;
spin_lock(&cpufreq_stats_lock);
stat->last_index = new_index;
@@ -317,6 +310,9 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct notifier_block *nb,
#endif
stat->total_trans++;
spin_unlock(&cpufreq_stats_lock);
+
+put_policy:
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 4d078cebafd2..60b7b496565d 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
wait_queue_head_t transition_wait;
struct task_struct *transition_task; /* Task which is doing the transition */
+ /* cpufreq-stats */
+ struct cpufreq_stats *stats;
+
/* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
void *driver_data;
};
--
2.2.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 15:38 [PATCH V3 00/16] cpufreq: stats: cleanups Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 01/16] cpufreq: stats: Improve module description string Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 02/16] cpufreq: stats: return -EEXIST when stats are already allocated Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 03/16] cpufreq: stats: remove unused cpufreq_stats_attribute Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 04/16] cpufreq: stats: initialize 'cur_time' on its definition Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 05/16] cpufreq: stats: don't check for freq table while freeing stats Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 06/16] cpufreq: stats: pass 'stat' to cpufreq_stats_update() Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 07/16] cpufreq: stats: get rid of per-cpu cpufreq_stats_table Viresh Kumar
2015-01-13 6:04 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 08/16] cpufreq: stats: rename 'struct cpufreq_stats' objects as 'stats' Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 09/16] cpufreq: Remove (now) unused 'last_cpu' from struct cpufreq_policy Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 10/16] cpufreq: stats: drop 'cpu' field of struct cpufreq_stats Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 11/16] cpufreq: remove CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU notifications Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 12/16] cpufreq: stats: create sysfs group once we are ready Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 13/16] cpufreq: stats: time_in_state can't be NULL in cpufreq_stats_update() Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 14/16] cpufreq: stats: don't update stats from show_trans_table() Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 15/16] cpufreq: stats: don't update stats on false notifiers Viresh Kumar
2015-01-06 15:39 ` [PATCH V3 16/16] cpufreq: stats: drop unnecessary locking Viresh Kumar
2015-01-12 6:12 ` [PATCH V3 00/16] cpufreq: stats: cleanups Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a075d926f65e72bf9c099e50deca54899ea91c7.1421128708.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).