From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 026/228] cpufreq: longhaul: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:29:32 +0530 Message-ID: <6f33640445b8b2129544a6ade3e365e917a85805.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: Return-path: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c index 4ada1cc..70b66fd 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c @@ -921,13 +921,7 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 200000; /* nsec */ policy->cur = calc_speed(longhaul_get_cpu_mult()); - ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, longhaul_table); - if (ret) - return ret; - - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(longhaul_table, policy->cpu); - - return 0; + return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, longhaul_table); } static int longhaul_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e