From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Locke <matthew.a.locke@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: PowerOP on lkml or linux-pm?
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:58:56 -0700
Message-ID: <7170ac0dd719652cf42d8f1a1fc0b605@comcast.net>
References: <20060913045405.BA7DD1A0084@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
	<ADE4D9DBCFC3A345AAA95C195F62B6DD01B6A3D9@de01exm64.ds.mot.com>
	<20060914091211.GA14874@elf.ucw.cz>
	<e6432982cff738586deabb583e237d9f@comcast.net>
	<20060914094512.GA16191@elf.ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060914094512.GA16191@elf.ucw.cz>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Eugeny Mints <eugeny@nomadgs.com>, pm list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org


On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:

> On Thu 2006-09-14 02:32:03, Matthew Locke wrote:
>> Pavel, Greg,
>>
>> I started CC'ing lkml as you guys requested (well forced really).  Now
>> we have half the discussion occurring on linux-pm and the other half =

>> on
>> both.  The guys on lkml are going to be lost and even more confused
>> than the people on this list.  If you guys want lkml to see the
>> discussion, make sure you add them to the CC when replying to linux-pm
>> only emails.
>
> Yep, try to cc lkml on new threads, and keep ccs intact when
> replying. That should be ok.

I don't understand why that would be ok.  lkml will miss key discussion =

in threads that don't include lkml required to understand the threads =

that include do lkml.  btw, isn't there some rule against cross posting =

like this?

>
>> Perhaps we should keep the discussion on linux-pm until we are all
>> straight and then send the results to lkml.  I'm open to whatever you
>> want as along as we are consistent.
>
> No, we want lkml included in the discussion.

Then you need to include lkml in the discussion not just random parts =

of the discussion.

> 								Pavel
>
> -- =

> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) =

> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>