From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: pwoertop frequencies not ordered descending Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:30:41 +0100 Message-ID: <7198242.H54ftQFeuz@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <54C6474E.6080805@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:52901 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751910AbbAZOH6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:07:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54C6474E.6080805@gmx.de> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Toralf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=F6rster?= Cc: "linux-pm >> Linux PM list" , Kristen Carlson Accardi Cc: Kristen On Monday, January 26, 2015 02:55:26 PM Toralf F=C3=B6rster wrote: > With the ACPI driver (and CPU governor "ondemand") the output of powe= rtop looked always fine. > However with the P-State driver I do now have this output at 2 harden= ed 64 bit Gentoo Linux systems: >=20 >=20 > PowerTOP 2.6 Overview Idle stats Frequency stats Device st= ats Tunables =20 >=20 >=20 > Package | Core | CPU 0 CP= U 1 > | | Actual 2.6 GHz 2.7= GHz > Idle 0.3% | Idle 63.2% | Idle 73.9% 7= 5.0% > 2.50 GHz 0.1% | 2.50 GHz 0.1% | 2.50 GHz 0.1% = 0.0% > 2.60 GHz 9.0% | 2.60 GHz 8.9% | 2.60 GHz 8.9% = 0.3% > 2.90 GHz 74.5% | 2.90 GHz 13.4% | 2.90 GHz 5.4% 1= 1.3% > 2.71 GHz 13.5% | 2.71 GHz 12.9% | 2.71 GHz 11.2% 1= 2.3% > 800 MHz 0.2% | 800 MHz 0.1% | 2.81 GHz 0.5% = 0.1% > 2.81 GHz 2.3% | 2.81 GHz 1.1% | 1200 MHz 0.0% = 0.9% > 900 MHz 0.0% | 1000 MHz 0.1% | 1100 MHz 0.0% = 0.1% > 1000 MHz 0.1% | 1200 MHz 0.0% | 1000 MHz 0.0% = 0.0% > 1200 MHz 0.0% | 900 MHz 0.0% | 800 MHz 0.0% = 0.0% > 1100 MHz 0.0% | 1100 MHz 0.0% | 900 MHz 0.0% = 0.0% > 1300 MHz 0.0% | 1500 MHz 0.0% | = 0.0% > 1500 MHz 0.0% | 1400 MHz 0.0% | = 0.0% > 1400 MHz 0.0% | | >=20 > | Core | CPU 2 CP= U 3 > | | Actual 2.8 GHz 2.8= GHz > | Idle 6.6% | Idle 23.1% 2= 4.9% > | 2.50 GHz 0.1% | 2.50 GHz 0.0% = 0.1% > | 2.60 GHz 8.9% | 2.60 GHz 0.1% = 8.9% > | 2.90 GHz 69.1% | 2.90 GHz 62.9% 6= 2.5% >=20 > Is this (partly ?) related to the kernel or just an issue of powertop= ? >=20 >=20 --=20 I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.