From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-s5pv210 to the pinctrl driver Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:20:41 +0100 Message-ID: <7931853.ZcRrqCbIhv@wuerfel> References: <1484833733-16082-13-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-samsung-soc , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Tomasz Figa , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "arm@kernel.org" , Sylwester Nawrocki , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Marek Szyprowski List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:11:33 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski > wrote: > > > This patch moves pad retention control from S5PV210 machine code to > > Exynos pin controller driver. This helps to avoid possible ordering > > and logical dependencies between machine and pin control code. Till > > now it worked fine only because sys_ops for machine code and pin > > controller were called in registration order. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > For mach-s5pv210: > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/pm.c | 7 ---- > > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/regs-clock.h | 4 --- > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Same here, can I have an ARM SoC ACK? > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann