public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:10:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bd4f2fb-70ce-3724-130f-f5c75ee7bde2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715203652.89912-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>


Hi Uwe,

Thanks for the patchset!

On 15.07.22 23:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All users ignore the return value of icc_provider_del(). Consequently
> make it not return an error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>   drivers/interconnect/core.c           | 10 +++-------
>   include/linux/interconnect-provider.h |  2 +-
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> index 808f6e7a8048..25debded65a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> @@ -1057,29 +1057,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_add);
>   /**
>    * icc_provider_del() - delete previously added interconnect provider
>    * @provider: the interconnect provider that will be removed from topology
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
>    */
> -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
>   {
>   	mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
>   	if (provider->users) {
>   		pr_warn("interconnect provider still has %d users\n",
>   			provider->users);
>   		mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> +		return;
>   	}

Looks like provider->users is now useless, so we should remove it. But that could be a separate 
clean-up.

>   
>   	if (!list_empty(&provider->nodes)) {
>   		pr_warn("interconnect provider still has nodes\n");
>   		mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> +		return;
>   	}
>   
>   	list_del(&provider->provider_list);
>   	mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> -
> -	return 0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_del);
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> index 6bd01f7159c6..191f083d1f3b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider);
>   void icc_node_del(struct icc_node *node);
>   int icc_nodes_remove(struct icc_provider *provider);
>   int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider);
> -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
>   struct icc_node_data *of_icc_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *spec);
>   void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev);

We should also squash the following:

--- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider)
  	return -ENOTSUPP;
  }

-static inline int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
+static inline void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
  {
  	return -ENOTSUPP;
  }

Thanks,
Georgi

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] interconnect: imx: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove() Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] interconnect: icc-rpm: " Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] interconnect: icc-rpmh: " Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] interconnect: msm8974: " Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] interconnect: osm-l3: " Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] interconnect: sm8450: " Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-18  9:10   ` Georgi Djakov [this message]
2022-07-18 12:16     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] interconnect: imx: Make imx_icc_unregister() " Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bd4f2fb-70ce-3724-130f-f5c75ee7bde2@kernel.org \
    --to=djakov@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox