* [PATCH 1/8] interconnect: imx: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove()
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] interconnect: icc-rpm: " Uwe Kleine-König
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Georgi Djakov, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer
Cc: kernel, Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
icc_provider_del() already emits an error message on failure. In this
case letting .remove() return the corresponding error code results in
another error message and the device is removed anyhow. (See
platform_remove().)
So ignore the return value of icc_provider_del() and return 0
unconditionally.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
index 249ca25d1d55..4c70530e3064 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
@@ -280,7 +280,9 @@ int imx_icc_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev)
imx_icc_unregister_nodes(provider);
- return icc_provider_del(provider);
+ icc_provider_del(provider);
+
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx_icc_unregister);
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/8] interconnect: icc-rpm: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove()
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] interconnect: imx: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove() Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] interconnect: icc-rpmh: " Uwe Kleine-König
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Georgi Djakov
Cc: kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, linux-kernel
icc_provider_del() already emits an error message on failure. In this
case letting .remove() return the corresponding error code results in
another error message and the device is removed anyhow. (See
platform_remove().)
So ignore the return value of icc_provider_del() and return 0
unconditionally.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
index fb013191c29b..189c25f8207a 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
@@ -447,6 +447,8 @@ int qnoc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
icc_nodes_remove(&qp->provider);
clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(qp->num_clks, qp->bus_clks);
- return icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+ icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(qnoc_remove);
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/8] interconnect: icc-rpmh: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove()
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] interconnect: imx: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove() Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] interconnect: icc-rpm: " Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] interconnect: msm8974: " Uwe Kleine-König
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Georgi Djakov
Cc: kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, linux-kernel
icc_provider_del() already emits an error message on failure. In this
case letting .remove() return the corresponding error code results in
another error message and the device is removed anyhow. (See
platform_remove().)
So ignore the return value of icc_provider_del() and return 0
unconditionally.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
index 3c40076eb5fb..5846dafbe40e 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
@@ -271,7 +271,9 @@ int qcom_icc_rpmh_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct qcom_icc_provider *qp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
icc_nodes_remove(&qp->provider);
- return icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+ icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_icc_rpmh_remove);
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/8] interconnect: msm8974: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove()
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] interconnect: icc-rpmh: " Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] interconnect: osm-l3: " Uwe Kleine-König
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Georgi Djakov
Cc: kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, linux-kernel
icc_provider_del() already emits an error message on failure. In this
case letting .remove() return the corresponding error code results in
another error message and the device is removed anyhow. (See
platform_remove().)
So ignore the return value of icc_provider_del() and return 0
unconditionally.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c
index 6fa0ad90fc3d..5ea192f1141d 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c
@@ -749,7 +749,9 @@ static int msm8974_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
icc_nodes_remove(&qp->provider);
clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(qp->num_clks, qp->bus_clks);
- return icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+ icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+
+ return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id msm8974_noc_of_match[] = {
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/8] interconnect: osm-l3: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove()
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] interconnect: msm8974: " Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] interconnect: sm8450: " Uwe Kleine-König
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Georgi Djakov
Cc: kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, linux-kernel
icc_provider_del() already emits an error message on failure. In this
case letting .remove() return the corresponding error code results in
another error message and the device is removed anyhow. (See
platform_remove().)
So ignore the return value of icc_provider_del() and return 0
unconditionally.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
index 4198656f4e59..ddbdf0943f94 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
@@ -217,7 +217,9 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider *qp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
icc_nodes_remove(&qp->provider);
- return icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+ icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6/8] interconnect: sm8450: Ignore return value of icc_provider_del() in .remove()
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] interconnect: osm-l3: " Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] interconnect: imx: Make imx_icc_unregister() " Uwe Kleine-König
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Georgi Djakov
Cc: kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, linux-kernel
icc_provider_del() already emits an error message on failure. In this
case letting .remove() return the corresponding error code results in
another error message and the device is removed anyhow. (See
platform_remove().)
So ignore the return value of icc_provider_del() and return 0
unconditionally.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c
index 7e3d372b712f..613c30df8aed 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c
@@ -1932,7 +1932,9 @@ static int qnoc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct qcom_icc_provider *qp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
icc_nodes_remove(&qp->provider);
- return icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+ icc_provider_del(&qp->provider);
+
+ return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id qnoc_of_match[] = {
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] interconnect: sm8450: " Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-18 9:10 ` Georgi Djakov
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] interconnect: imx: Make imx_icc_unregister() " Uwe Kleine-König
7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Georgi Djakov; +Cc: kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel
All users ignore the return value of icc_provider_del(). Consequently
make it not return an error code.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/core.c | 10 +++-------
include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
index 808f6e7a8048..25debded65a8 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
@@ -1057,29 +1057,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_add);
/**
* icc_provider_del() - delete previously added interconnect provider
* @provider: the interconnect provider that will be removed from topology
- *
- * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
*/
-int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
+void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
{
mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
if (provider->users) {
pr_warn("interconnect provider still has %d users\n",
provider->users);
mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
- return -EBUSY;
+ return;
}
if (!list_empty(&provider->nodes)) {
pr_warn("interconnect provider still has nodes\n");
mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
- return -EBUSY;
+ return;
}
list_del(&provider->provider_list);
mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
-
- return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_del);
diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
index 6bd01f7159c6..191f083d1f3b 100644
--- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider);
void icc_node_del(struct icc_node *node);
int icc_nodes_remove(struct icc_provider *provider);
int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider);
-int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
+void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
struct icc_node_data *of_icc_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *spec);
void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev);
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-18 9:10 ` Georgi Djakov
2022-07-18 12:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Georgi Djakov @ 2022-07-18 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for the patchset!
On 15.07.22 23:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> All users ignore the return value of icc_provider_del(). Consequently
> make it not return an error code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/interconnect/core.c | 10 +++-------
> include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> index 808f6e7a8048..25debded65a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> @@ -1057,29 +1057,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_add);
> /**
> * icc_provider_del() - delete previously added interconnect provider
> * @provider: the interconnect provider that will be removed from topology
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
> */
> -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> {
> mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
> if (provider->users) {
> pr_warn("interconnect provider still has %d users\n",
> provider->users);
> mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> - return -EBUSY;
> + return;
> }
Looks like provider->users is now useless, so we should remove it. But that could be a separate
clean-up.
>
> if (!list_empty(&provider->nodes)) {
> pr_warn("interconnect provider still has nodes\n");
> mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> - return -EBUSY;
> + return;
> }
>
> list_del(&provider->provider_list);
> mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> -
> - return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_del);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> index 6bd01f7159c6..191f083d1f3b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider);
> void icc_node_del(struct icc_node *node);
> int icc_nodes_remove(struct icc_provider *provider);
> int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider);
> -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> struct icc_node_data *of_icc_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *spec);
> void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev);
We should also squash the following:
--- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
-static inline int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
+static inline void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
{
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
Thanks,
Georgi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void
2022-07-18 9:10 ` Georgi Djakov
@ 2022-07-18 12:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-18 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Georgi Djakov; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel, linux-pm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3510 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:10:34PM +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> Thanks for the patchset!
>
> On 15.07.22 23:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > All users ignore the return value of icc_provider_del(). Consequently
> > make it not return an error code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/interconnect/core.c | 10 +++-------
> > include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> > index 808f6e7a8048..25debded65a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> > @@ -1057,29 +1057,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_add);
> > /**
> > * icc_provider_del() - delete previously added interconnect provider
> > * @provider: the interconnect provider that will be removed from topology
> > - *
> > - * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
> > */
> > -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> > +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> > {
> > mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
> > if (provider->users) {
> > pr_warn("interconnect provider still has %d users\n",
> > provider->users);
> > mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + return;
> > }
>
> Looks like provider->users is now useless, so we should remove it. But that
> could be a separate clean-up.
Well, it's still used to emit the warning. If this can trigger there is
indeed a problem though. If there are still users, they should hold a
reference to the device preventing its release.
> > if (!list_empty(&provider->nodes)) {
> > pr_warn("interconnect provider still has nodes\n");
> > mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + return;
> > }
> > list_del(&provider->provider_list);
> > mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_provider_del);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> > index 6bd01f7159c6..191f083d1f3b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider);
> > void icc_node_del(struct icc_node *node);
> > int icc_nodes_remove(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > -int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > +void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider);
> > struct icc_node_data *of_icc_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *spec);
> > void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev);
>
> We should also squash the following:
>
> --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline int icc_provider_add(struct icc_provider *provider)
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> -static inline int icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> +static inline void icc_provider_del(struct icc_provider *provider)
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
Sent a v2 with this change (and also removed the return statement).
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 8/8] interconnect: imx: Make imx_icc_unregister() return void
2022-07-15 20:36 [PATCH 0/8] interconnect: Prepare making platform remove callbacks return void Uwe Kleine-König
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-15 20:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] interconnect: Make icc_provider_del() return void Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-07-15 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-07-15 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Georgi Djakov, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer
Cc: kernel, Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
The function imx_icc_unregister() returns zero unconditionally. Make it
return void.
This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c | 4 +---
drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h | 2 +-
drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c | 4 +++-
drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c | 4 +++-
drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c | 4 +++-
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
index 4c70530e3064..e96794acad59 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
@@ -274,15 +274,13 @@ int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx_icc_register);
-int imx_icc_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev)
+void imx_icc_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct icc_provider *provider = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
imx_icc_unregister_nodes(provider);
icc_provider_del(provider);
-
- return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx_icc_unregister);
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h
index 75da51076c68..b533c9a99710 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h
@@ -56,6 +56,6 @@ struct imx_icc_node_desc {
int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes,
int nodes_count);
-int imx_icc_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev);
+void imx_icc_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev);
#endif /* __DRIVERS_INTERCONNECT_IMX_H */
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
index 1083490bb391..fa9639c6ea37 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
@@ -88,7 +88,9 @@ static int imx8mm_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int imx8mm_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- return imx_icc_unregister(pdev);
+ imx_icc_unregister(pdev);
+
+ return 0;
}
static struct platform_driver imx8mm_icc_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
index ad97e55fd4e5..3b11571c23d0 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
@@ -77,7 +77,9 @@ static int imx8mn_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int imx8mn_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- return imx_icc_unregister(pdev);
+ imx_icc_unregister(pdev);
+
+ return 0;
}
static struct platform_driver imx8mn_icc_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
index d7768d3c6d8a..fb19b90d6767 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ static int imx8mq_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int imx8mq_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- return imx_icc_unregister(pdev);
+ imx_icc_unregister(pdev);
+
+ return 0;
}
static struct platform_driver imx8mq_icc_driver = {
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread