linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 10/10] PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table()
Date: Mon,  2 Jan 2017 14:41:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d4e1b547d5a5e0519edf42cbb2e9ce6e609a901.1483348138.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1483348138.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1483348138.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Split out parts of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() into
separate routines. This improves readability as well.

Should result in no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
index f35effad60d1..622dd32f8dda 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
@@ -819,26 +819,12 @@ struct opp_device *_add_opp_dev(const struct device *dev,
 	return opp_dev;
 }
 
-/**
- * _add_opp_table() - Find OPP table or allocate a new one
- * @dev:	device for which we do this operation
- *
- * It tries to find an existing table first, if it couldn't find one, it
- * allocates a new OPP table and returns that.
- *
- * Return: valid opp_table pointer if success, else NULL.
- */
-struct opp_table *_add_opp_table(struct device *dev)
+static struct opp_table *_allocate_opp_table(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct opp_table *opp_table;
 	struct opp_device *opp_dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	/* Check for existing table for 'dev' first */
-	opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
-	if (!IS_ERR(opp_table))
-		return opp_table;
-
 	/*
 	 * Allocate a new OPP table. In the infrequent case where a new
 	 * device is needed to be added, we pay this penalty.
@@ -875,6 +861,27 @@ struct opp_table *_add_opp_table(struct device *dev)
 }
 
 /**
+ * _add_opp_table() - Find OPP table or allocate a new one
+ * @dev:	device for which we do this operation
+ *
+ * It tries to find an existing table first, if it couldn't find one, it
+ * allocates a new OPP table and returns that.
+ *
+ * Return: valid opp_table pointer if success, else NULL.
+ */
+struct opp_table *_add_opp_table(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct opp_table *opp_table;
+
+	/* Check for existing table for 'dev' first */
+	opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
+	if (!IS_ERR(opp_table))
+		return opp_table;
+
+	return _allocate_opp_table(dev);
+}
+
+/**
  * _kfree_device_rcu() - Free opp_table RCU handler
  * @head:	RCU head
  */
@@ -886,6 +893,27 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
 	kfree_rcu(opp_table, rcu_head);
 }
 
+static void _free_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
+{
+	struct opp_device *opp_dev;
+
+	/* Release clk */
+	if (!IS_ERR(opp_table->clk))
+		clk_put(opp_table->clk);
+
+	opp_dev = list_first_entry(&opp_table->dev_list, struct opp_device,
+				   node);
+
+	_remove_opp_dev(opp_dev, opp_table);
+
+	/* dev_list must be empty now */
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->dev_list));
+
+	list_del_rcu(&opp_table->node);
+	call_srcu(&opp_table->srcu_head.srcu, &opp_table->rcu_head,
+		  _kfree_device_rcu);
+}
+
 /**
  * _remove_opp_table() - Removes a OPP table
  * @opp_table: OPP table to be removed.
@@ -894,8 +922,6 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
  */
 static void _remove_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
-	struct opp_device *opp_dev;
-
 	if (!list_empty(&opp_table->opp_list))
 		return;
 
@@ -911,21 +937,7 @@ static void _remove_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 	if (opp_table->set_opp)
 		return;
 
-	/* Release clk */
-	if (!IS_ERR(opp_table->clk))
-		clk_put(opp_table->clk);
-
-	opp_dev = list_first_entry(&opp_table->dev_list, struct opp_device,
-				   node);
-
-	_remove_opp_dev(opp_dev, opp_table);
-
-	/* dev_list must be empty now */
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->dev_list));
-
-	list_del_rcu(&opp_table->node);
-	call_srcu(&opp_table->srcu_head.srcu, &opp_table->rcu_head,
-		  _kfree_device_rcu);
+	_free_opp_table(opp_table);
 }
 
 void _opp_free(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-02  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-02  9:10 [PATCH V3 00/10] PM / OPP: Fixes and cleanups Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:10 ` [PATCH V3 01/10] PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:10 ` [PATCH V3 02/10] PM / OPP: Remove useless TODO Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:10 ` [PATCH V3 03/10] PM / OPP: Rename _allocate_opp() to _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:10 ` [PATCH V3 04/10] PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:10 ` [PATCH V3 05/10] PM / OPP: Add light weight _opp_free() routine Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:11 ` [PATCH V3 06/10] PM / OPP: Rename and split _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:11 ` [PATCH V3 07/10] PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:11 ` [PATCH V3 08/10] PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rate Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:11 ` [PATCH V3 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers Viresh Kumar
2017-01-02  9:11 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7d4e1b547d5a5e0519edf42cbb2e9ce6e609a901.1483348138.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).