From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] QoS: Modify data structures and function arguments for scalability. Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0700 Message-ID: <7hbnrhwepp.fsf@paris.lan> References: <1407945689-18494-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <1407945689-18494-2-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:56000 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbaHRXiq (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:38:46 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id fp1so8447692pdb.33 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:38:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1407945689-18494-2-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> (Lina Iyer's message of "Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:01:26 -0600") Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lina Iyer Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rjw@rjwysocki.net, Praveen Chidambaram Lina Iyer writes: > QoS add requests uses a handle to the priority list that is used > internally to save the request, but this does not extend well. Also, > dev_pm_qos structure definition seems to use a list object directly. > The 'derivative' relationship seems to be broken. > > Use pm_qos_request objects instead of passing around the protected > priority list object. > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Chidambaram > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer This looks like a good cleanup. Acked-by: Kevin Hilman Kevin