From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F88C433E6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF6D2071B for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729004AbgIATHR (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:07:17 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:63806 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726107AbgIATHQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:07:16 -0400 IronPort-SDR: PKw8KBYDoU8ZLUShZh7Wm8URCC04sN1rFEAmLYf/diilx5b7sKDFAeU5R/QPX8NmT6Rw0TdOVL 6BMNfBIKc2gw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9731"; a="242076431" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,380,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="242076431" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2020 12:07:14 -0700 IronPort-SDR: Y0QpoXYKfjIAJWqzdi17Y3vk5+rA+zAu5vHVuWaXf0bYuO1wpbjNTy5TbTnVxh2ahy0BpyG7nV o8/m22Zl9uTQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,380,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="446251312" Received: from spandruv-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.255.231.183]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2020 12:07:14 -0700 Message-ID: <818b61c1375dabc60df770bbc462ce6728091dbc.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Address some HWP-related oddities From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM Cc: LKML , Doug Smythies , Artem Bityutskiy Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:07:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3748218.V0HrpZKF9g@kreacher> References: <3748218.V0HrpZKF9g@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 19:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > The last two patches in the v3 needed to be updated to take re- > enabling of HWP > after an ACPI S3 suspend/resume cycle into account > appropriately. The first > three patches are the same as before. > > The purpose of this series is to address some peculiarities related > to > taking CPUs offline/online and switching between different operation > modes with HWP enabled that have become visible after allowing the > driver to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled in 5.9-rc1 (and > one that was there earlier, but can be addressed easily after the > changes made in 5.9-rc1). > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. > > For easier testing/review, the series is available from the git > branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > intel_pstate-testing > > I've done my best to address all of the possible corner cases, but > the test > matrix is quite extensive and I may have missed something, so go > ahead > and test. Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada > > Thanks, > Rafael > > >