Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Sapphire Rapids C0.x idle states support

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 14:34 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 1:37 PM Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 19:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 12:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Artem Bityutskiy (4):
> > > >   x86/umwait: use 'IS_ENABLED()'
> > > >   x86/mwait: Add support for idle via umwait
> > > 
> > > If these 2 patches are OK now, is there a chance to get them merged?
> > 
> > Hi, I wonder if these 2 patches have any chances to get merged?
> > 
> > May be there is something I am expected to do have not done? If so, please,
> > accept my apologies and give me a direction.
> 
> I think that they were based on the Arjan\s changes that got dropped.
> If so, they need to be rebased and resent.

The above quoted 2 patches are x86 bits, they introduce the basic umwait
primitives. They are not based on Arjan's patches. They still apply cleanly, and
do not need a refresh, as far as I can see.

I was hoping to get arch/x86 bits merged. Then I would send the refreshed
version of the intel_idle patches.

Thanks,
Artem.