From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ECEEDEC4D for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232971AbjIMMtw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:49:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41958 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234730AbjIMMtv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:49:51 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BE619B9 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 05:49:47 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10832"; a="378560934" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,143,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="378560934" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2023 05:49:08 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10832"; a="809665559" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,143,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="809665559" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2023 05:49:07 -0700 Received: from abityuts-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (abityuts-desk1.fi.intel.com [10.237.68.150]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039CD580DCD; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 05:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <81abd4de9da3a8e93c80ef67127323e03cf779a0.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Sapphire Rapids C0.x idle states support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Linux PM Mailing List , Arjan van de Ven Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:49:04 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <20230710093100.918337-1-dedekind1@gmail.com> <52419d763dbd93e91499084c2bf4c04b199857a3.camel@gmail.com> <33af8e4b992f766b14b3b42939f5ae7701837847.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 14:34 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 1:37 PM Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 19:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 12:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > > > > Artem Bityutskiy (4): > > > >   x86/umwait: use 'IS_ENABLED()' > > > >   x86/mwait: Add support for idle via umwait > > > > > > If these 2 patches are OK now, is there a chance to get them merged? > > > > Hi, I wonder if these 2 patches have any chances to get merged? > > > > May be there is something I am expected to do have not done? If so, please, > > accept my apologies and give me a direction. > > I think that they were based on the Arjan\s changes that got dropped. > If so, they need to be rebased and resent. The above quoted 2 patches are x86 bits, they introduce the basic umwait primitives. They are not based on Arjan's patches. They still apply cleanly, and do not need a refresh, as far as I can see. I was hoping to get arch/x86 bits merged. Then I would send the refreshed version of the intel_idle patches. Thanks, Artem.