From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>,
edubezval@gmail.com
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Fix Wshift-negative-value
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:52:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82458318837ed1154a183be0b96337fc7809c645.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8b8a48-dfb7-1478-2d8d-0953acee39d3@linaro.org>
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 12:52 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> On 13/06/2019 23:12, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> > Clang produces the following warning
> >
> > vers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c:147:33: warning: shifting a
> > negative
> > signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] / (ptat[0] -
> > ptat[2])) +
> > FIXPT_INT(TJ_3); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c:126:29
> > note: expanded from macro 'FIXPT_INT' #define FIXPT_INT(_x) ((_x)
> > <<
> > FIXPT_SHIFT) ~~~~ ^ drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c:150:18:
> > warning:
> > shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-
> > value]
> > tsc->tj_t - FIXPT_INT(TJ_3)); ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Upon further investigating it looks like there is no real reason
> > for
> > TJ_3 to be -41. Usages subtract -41, code would be cleaner to just
> > add.
>
> All the code seems broken regarding the negative value shifting as
> the
> macros pass an integer:
>
> eg.
> tsc->coef.a2 = FIXPT_DIV(FIXPT_INT(thcode[1] - thcode[0]),
> tsc->tj_t - FIXPT_INT(ths_tj_1));
>
> thcode[1] is always < than thcode[0],
>
> thcode[1] - thcode[0] < 0
>
> FIXPT_INT(thcode[1] - thcode[0]) is undefined
>
>
> Is it done on purpose FIXPT_DIV(FIXPT_INT(thcode[1] - thcode[0]) ?
>
> Try developing the macro with the coef.a2 computation ...
>
> The code quality of this driver could be better, it deserves a rework
> IMHO ...
>
> I suggest to revert:
>
> 4eb39f79ef443fa566d36bd43f1f578d5c140305
> bdc4480a669d476814061b4da6bb006f7048c8e5
> 6a310f8f97bb8bc2e2bb9db6f49a1b8678c8d144
>
> Rework the coefficient computation and re-introduce what was reverted
> in
> a nicer way.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Yoshihiro,
can you please clarify on this? Or else I will revert the above commits
first?
Also CC Wolfram Sang, the driver author.
thanks,
rui
>
>
> > Fixes: 4eb39f79ef44 ("thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Update value of
> > Tj_1")
> > Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/531
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
> > index a56463308694..f4b4558c08e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static inline void
> > rcar_gen3_thermal_write(struct rcar_gen3_thermal_tsc *tsc,
> > #define RCAR3_THERMAL_GRAN 500 /* mili Celsius */
> >
> > /* no idea where these constants come from */
> > -#define TJ_3 -41
> > +#define TJ_3 41
> >
> > static void rcar_gen3_thermal_calc_coefs(struct
> > rcar_gen3_thermal_tsc *tsc,
> > int *ptat, const int *thcode,
> > @@ -144,11 +144,11 @@ static void
> > rcar_gen3_thermal_calc_coefs(struct rcar_gen3_thermal_tsc *tsc,
> > * the dividend (4095 * 4095 << 14 > INT_MAX) so keep it
> > unscaled
> > */
> > tsc->tj_t = (FIXPT_INT((ptat[1] - ptat[2]) * 157)
> > - / (ptat[0] - ptat[2])) + FIXPT_INT(TJ_3);
> > + / (ptat[0] - ptat[2])) - FIXPT_INT(TJ_3);
> >
> > tsc->coef.a1 = FIXPT_DIV(FIXPT_INT(thcode[1] - thcode[2]),
> > - tsc->tj_t - FIXPT_INT(TJ_3));
> > - tsc->coef.b1 = FIXPT_INT(thcode[2]) - tsc->coef.a1 * TJ_3;
> > + tsc->tj_t + FIXPT_INT(TJ_3));
> > + tsc->coef.b1 = FIXPT_INT(thcode[2]) + tsc->coef.a1 * TJ_3;
> >
> > tsc->coef.a2 = FIXPT_DIV(FIXPT_INT(thcode[1] - thcode[0]),
> > tsc->tj_t - FIXPT_INT(ths_tj_1));
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 21:12 [PATCH] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Fix Wshift-negative-value Nathan Huckleberry
2019-06-14 10:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-08-13 20:12 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2019-08-28 8:52 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2019-08-29 13:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-31 7:40 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82458318837ed1154a183be0b96337fc7809c645.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhuck@google.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=ykaneko0929@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox