From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E9BC3A5A9 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 02:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5730E206D7 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 02:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728088AbgEECNF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 22:13:05 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:46982 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726549AbgEECNF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 22:13:05 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 49DE07E1D44437D1473C; Tue, 5 May 2020 10:13:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.166.215.101) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:55 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: add support for HiSilicon SoC HIP09 To: Sudeep Holla CC: , , , , , References: <1588227599-46438-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> <20200430095559.GB28579@bogus> From: Xiongfeng Wang Message-ID: <84181382-2daf-b05f-ec46-278c1d5fe8a8@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:54 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200430095559.GB28579@bogus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.166.215.101] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi Sudeep, Thanks for your reply. On 2020/4/30 17:55, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 02:19:59PM +0800, Xiongfeng Wang wrote: >> HiSilicon SoC has a separate System Control Processor(SCP) dedicated for >> clock frequency adjustment and has been using the cpufreq driver >> 'cppc-cpufreq'. New HiSilicon SoC HIP09 add support for CPU Boost, but >> ACPI CPPC doesn't support this. In HiSilicon SoC HIP09, each core has >> its own clock domain. It is better for the core itself to adjust its >> frequency when we require fast response. In this patch, we add a >> separate cpufreq driver for HiSilicon SoC HIP09. >> > > I disagree with this approach unless you have tried to extend the CPPC > in ACPI to accommodate this boost feature you need. Until you show those > efforts and disagreement to do that from ASWG, I am NACKing this approach. I will try to extend the CPPC to accommodate the CPU Boost feature. Thanks, Xiongfeng > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep > > . >