From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: Status of the PM links framework Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:58:15 -0800 Message-ID: <878vyxu22w.fsf@ti.com> References: <201012201444.01510.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <201012202339.02468.rjw@sisk.pl> <201012210041.54652.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <201012241521.10155.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201012241521.10155.rjw@sisk.pl> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:21:10 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Laurent Pinchart List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: [...] > > Please note, however, that this only applies to _system_ suspend/resume, it > doesn't cover runtime PM at all. > This is a very interesting point, since on OMAP we are heavily using runtime PM, and only occasionally using system PM. Any PM dependency solution will need to work for both. Kevin