From: Tamas Papp <tkpapp@gmail.com>
To: yu chen <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: STI problem and workaround for Dell XPS 13 (Skylake, 2016) / Broadcom BCM4350
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 08:36:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bn6ubspe.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADjb_WQcXK5kc4d9isPGcw6=oVUbnZ9P77owOcmq=KSh7wEYbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 04 2016, yu chen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Tamas Papp <tkpapp@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 02 2016, yu chen wrote:
>>
>>> Currently the 0000:3c and 0000:3a might have the same pnp object name PXSX,
>>> unfortunately the 'echo' will find the first math device in the
>>> wakable list, and maybe
>>> 0000:3c was probed before 0000:3a, so... maybe this is a weakness.
>>>
>>> Maybe you can disabled the wakable feature directly in device sysfs,
>>> for example,
>>> echo 0 > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:3a:00.0/power/wakeup,
>>> you might need to find out where 0000:3a:00.0 is.
>>
>> I tried that, but the module has problems after wakeup. I have to remove
>> and insert it again with modprobe.
>>
>> Still, this is an OK workaround, thanks for the help. I still don't know
>> if I should file this as a bug, and if yes, where.
>>
> Does the following fix make sense for you:
>
> cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
> PXSX:0 S4 *enabled pci:0000:3a:00.0
> then you need to echo PXSX:0 to disable it,
> and for 3c, it would be PXSX:1
Sorry, I am confused --- is this a proposed new syntax for
/proc/acpi/wakeup? I guess this could work. BTW, for kernel 4.4.3, I
don't need any fix (that's what I am using now), it works out of the
box, I just need to fiddle with the broadcom module in 4.5.0-rc6.
Best,
Tamas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-04 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-02 9:51 STI problem and workaround for Dell XPS 13 (Skylake, 2016) / Broadcom BCM4350 Tamas Papp
2016-03-02 13:08 ` yu chen
2016-03-02 14:13 ` Tamas Papp
2016-03-02 14:44 ` yu chen
2016-03-03 7:16 ` Tamas Papp
2016-03-04 1:41 ` yu chen
2016-03-04 7:30 ` yu chen
2016-03-04 7:36 ` Tamas Papp [this message]
2016-03-04 7:49 ` yu chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bn6ubspe.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=tkpapp@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).